2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New procedure for active earth pressure calculation in retaining walls with reinforced cohesive-frictional backfill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, Coulomb pioneered the investigation of lateral earth pressure on the retaining wall by assuming a plane failure surface under limit equilibrium conditions (Coulomb 1776). Various developments rooted in Coulomb earth pressure theory have been reported considering more general ground and loading conditions, for examples in recent years, surcharge loading (Motta 1994;Greco 2005), seismic effects (Wang et al 2008a;Ahmad 2013;Brandenberg et al 2015), cohesive-frictional backfill (Ahmadabadi and Ghanbari 2009;Chen 2014;Xu 2015), and different slip surfaces (Li and Liu 2010;Ouyang et al 2013;Patki et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, Coulomb pioneered the investigation of lateral earth pressure on the retaining wall by assuming a plane failure surface under limit equilibrium conditions (Coulomb 1776). Various developments rooted in Coulomb earth pressure theory have been reported considering more general ground and loading conditions, for examples in recent years, surcharge loading (Motta 1994;Greco 2005), seismic effects (Wang et al 2008a;Ahmad 2013;Brandenberg et al 2015), cohesive-frictional backfill (Ahmadabadi and Ghanbari 2009;Chen 2014;Xu 2015), and different slip surfaces (Li and Liu 2010;Ouyang et al 2013;Patki et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, several experimental and numerical investigations have been carried out to determine the effective parameters in GRS walls (Fishman et al, 1993;Palmeira and Gomes, 1996;Ho and Rowe, 1996;Tatsuoka et al, 1997a,b;Rowe and Ho, 1998;Garg, 1998;Ling et al, 2000;Rowe and Skinner, 2001;Koerner and Soong, 2001;Yoo, 2004;Kazimierowicz-Frankowska, 2005;Bathurst et al, 2005;Benjamim et al, 2007;Hatami and Witthoeft, 2008;Yoo and Kim, 2008;Liu and Won, 2009;Yang et al, 2009;Ahmadabadi and Ghanbari, 2009;Liu, 2012). However, despite these extensive investigations, the effect of compaction has been rarely considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghanbari and Taheri [23] calculated the pressure on wall and reinforced force with the effect of surcharge on reinforced soil walls, under the assumption of Ahmadabadi and Ghanbari [24]. The results for changes in the angle of failure wedge with the size of the surcharge suggest that increasing the amount of surcharge will result in an increase in the angle of failure wedge; however, by changing the distance of the surcharge from the wall, the angle of failure wedge does not change any more.…”
Section: Advances In Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%