CIRED Workshop 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2016.0661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New planning principles for low voltage networks with a high share of decentralized generation

Abstract: This paper describes new planning principles for rural low voltage networks, which have to be significantly expanded due to the required integration of distributed energy resources. The planning principles focus on the optimized use of innovative technologies (like feed-in management and voltage controller) in order to lower the total costs of necessary network reinforcement. In order to derive these planning principles technical and economical results of multiple concrete and representative low voltage distri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e power loss and reliability of the LV networks improved in the DNP problem considering the DGs in [20]. In [21], new planning principles are described for rural LV networks considering DGs to minimize total costs. In [22], optimal sizing, sitting, and scheduling of BSSs are calculated in an LV distribution system.…”
Section: Motivation and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e power loss and reliability of the LV networks improved in the DNP problem considering the DGs in [20]. In [21], new planning principles are described for rural LV networks considering DGs to minimize total costs. In [22], optimal sizing, sitting, and scheduling of BSSs are calculated in an LV distribution system.…”
Section: Motivation and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A much higher influence of the flexibility options can be seen in the grid reinforcement costs: the RES-option may save up to 239 kEUR (85 %), the CES-option 232 kEUR (83 %), the options cosϕ(P) and Q(V) 220 kEUR (79 %) and the PCR-option 30 kEUR (32 %) of the grid expansion costs until 2025. Thus, all options, except the PCR-option, have a higher potential to reduce grid expansion costs as the 58 % reported by [34] for static feed-in management, in which the active power of the PV system is limited to 60 %, which from the DSO's perpective is very similar to the RES option. The comparison with [34], shows also that the results presented in this study are consistent, as the RES-option (50 % feed-in limit), shows higher saving potential, than the static feed-in (60 % feed-in limit) management option of [34].…”
Section: Economic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of this information, suitable conventional and innovative planning measures are selected, used to develop various target grid planning studies, subsequently compared, and finally evaluated on the basis of various criteria. The result is an optimal target grid planning which is used as the basis for the implementation [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Basic Planning Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CI and HPs play an increasingly important role in the dimensioning of urban LV grids. Furthermore, according to [16], decentralized energy conversion systems such as photovoltaic systems (PVSs) are particularly relevant for grid planning of rural and suburban areas.…”
Section: New Loads In Urban Low-voltage Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation