2016
DOI: 10.1163/15685179-12341404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Perspectives on the Significance of the Scrolls for the New Testament and Early Christian Literature

Abstract: This article places the contributions of the thematic volume in the larger research context where the Dead Sea Scrolls and early Christian source texts have been juxtaposed and compared with each other. Whereas earlier scholarship was keen on identifying direct links and dependencies or, alternatively, underlining dissimilarities between the Scrolls’ Judaean priestly movement and the Galilean non-elite Jesus movement and its diaspora follow-up, this thematic volume represents more nuanced attempts to contextua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brooke 1997, 1998). The earlier of these two essays explores a shared ‘canon within the canon’ of key texts (Genesis, Deuteronomy, Isaiah, and the Psalms), whose use in both the scrolls and the New Testament allowed their communities ‘to justify their positions as the true representatives of Israel’ (1997; updated in Brooke 2005a: 50-51). More explicitly theoretical is Brooke 1998, where Kristevan intertextuality provides a new means of understanding shared textual citations and interpretations.…”
Section: Deconstructing the Dead Sea Scrollsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Brooke 1997, 1998). The earlier of these two essays explores a shared ‘canon within the canon’ of key texts (Genesis, Deuteronomy, Isaiah, and the Psalms), whose use in both the scrolls and the New Testament allowed their communities ‘to justify their positions as the true representatives of Israel’ (1997; updated in Brooke 2005a: 50-51). More explicitly theoretical is Brooke 1998, where Kristevan intertextuality provides a new means of understanding shared textual citations and interpretations.…”
Section: Deconstructing the Dead Sea Scrollsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More explicitly theoretical is Brooke 1998, where Kristevan intertextuality provides a new means of understanding shared textual citations and interpretations. ‘Attention to intertextuality shows the distinctiveness of each set of writings but also that much in the New Testament is the common stock of eschatologically oriented first-century Palestinian Judaism’ (1998; updated in Brooke 2005a: 94).…”
Section: Deconstructing the Dead Sea Scrollsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many comparisons have been made between the Dead Sea Scrolls, on one hand, and the New Testament and early Christianity, on the other (Braun 1966; Brooke 2005; Pate 2000). From the earliest reports of the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, indeed even from the discovery of the Damascus Document (then called the Zadokite Fragments) in the Cairo genizah , there have been persistent claims that the Scrolls were in some way closely related to early Christianity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%