2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4954998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New orientations in the stereographic triangle for self-assembled faceting

Abstract: Energetically unstable crystalline surfaces, among their uses, can be templates for the growth of periodic arrays of one-dimensional (1D) nanoscale structures. However, few studies have explored self-assembled faceting on high-index (HI) planes inside the stereographic triangle, and extant studies have not produced any criteria for encouraging the formation of one-dimensional periodic arrays. In this Letter, by analyzing the MBE growth of homoepitaxial facets on (631)A GaAs, a HI plane inside the triangle, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By choosing the appropriate growth parameters, the high-index surfaces break up into microscopic step arrays, which lead to straight coherently aligned multi-atomic step arrays in preferential directions, 12) through surface free energy minimization processes. 13) As described in the experimental section, the substrate temperature was decreased to proceed with the incorporation of InAs, which changes both the sample surface energy and the strain status at the interface. All of the images in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By choosing the appropriate growth parameters, the high-index surfaces break up into microscopic step arrays, which lead to straight coherently aligned multi-atomic step arrays in preferential directions, 12) through surface free energy minimization processes. 13) As described in the experimental section, the substrate temperature was decreased to proceed with the incorporation of InAs, which changes both the sample surface energy and the strain status at the interface. All of the images in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the methods presented here cannot rule out the presence of other facets, which would have orientations in between the ones discussed so far. High-index planes have been observed on GaAs and can even be as stable as low-index ones [50][51][52]. The driving force for the existence of such surfaces is the minimization of the number of dangling bonds and strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In figure 3 we show a similar map of the out-of-plane strain of four tensile strained In x Ga 1-x P (x∼38%-40%) layers in a lattice matched (Al 0.5 Ga 0.5 ) 0.5 In 0.5 P matrix and a region with nominal {GaP/(Al 0.8 Ga 0.2)0.5 In 0.5 P} superlattice grown on (211)A GaAs substrate. Possibly due to a different nature of the interface structure for (211)A surface [22,23] and a higher role of the segregation effects for this surface orientation no clear observation of GaP-enriched superlattice layers was possible. However, the average tensile strain due to excess GaP concentration of ∼10% is clearly manifested in the nominal barrier region and the effect of the barrier height modification as a function of substrate orientation [13] should be present, even it is much weaker as compared to the MBE case for the same substrate orientation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%