“…Different TD-DFT methods (TD-B3LYP, TD-PBE0, and TD-M06–2X) and basis sets (6-31G* and 6-31+G*) were employed to calculate the lowest-energy electronic transitions of both molecules in the chosen solvents (see Table S3 in Supporting Information). High oscillator strengths were found for these transitions ( f ≥ 1.2; see Table ) in agreement to the previous observations reported for compound 3b , other related phenylenevinylenes, and, in general, systems with large number of conjugated rings such as coumarins, porphyrins, phthalocyanines, and graphene nanoribbons, among others. ,− The combination of TD-M06–2X and 6-31+G* yielded the best match between calculated and experimental values. The higher percentage of HF-like exchange in M06-2X, compared to B3LYP and PBE0, reduces any possible underestimation in the calculation of the excited-state energies, in agreement with previous works. ,, According to the findings obtained with TD-M06-2X/6-31+G*, the lowest energy absorption band of compound 1 corresponds to two π–π* electronic transitions whose main components are HOMO–1 → LUMO and HOMO → LUMO electronic excitations (see Table ).…”