2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New oral formulation of cyclosporin A (Neoral) pharmacokinetics in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients

Abstract: Summary:Cyclosporin A (CsA) absorption is variable in bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients compromising the efficacy of graft-versus-host disease prevention. Neoral, a new microemulsion formulation of CsA which has an improved bioavailibility, increases intestinal absorption of the drug with less variable pharmacokinetic parameters in non-BMT patients. In order to predict the best dosage of Neoral when patients are switched from i.v. to oral administration we performed a randomised study comparing two oral do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the very first oral peptide drug delivery system that reached the market in 1981, namely Sandimmune (Cyclosporin A) was a self-emulsifying drug delivery system (Klyashchitsky and Owen, 1998) and the later on further improved selfemulsifying system (Neoral) for the same therapeutic peptide still shows with 40% (Parquet et al, 2000) of the highest bioavailability of all marketed peptide drug formulations, this formulation strategy for therapeutic peptides was obviously almost ignored at least by academia for several decades. A likely explanation for it might be the hydrophilic character of most therapeutic peptides being in contrast to cyclosporine that did not allow drug incorporation in lipophilic droplets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the very first oral peptide drug delivery system that reached the market in 1981, namely Sandimmune (Cyclosporin A) was a self-emulsifying drug delivery system (Klyashchitsky and Owen, 1998) and the later on further improved selfemulsifying system (Neoral) for the same therapeutic peptide still shows with 40% (Parquet et al, 2000) of the highest bioavailability of all marketed peptide drug formulations, this formulation strategy for therapeutic peptides was obviously almost ignored at least by academia for several decades. A likely explanation for it might be the hydrophilic character of most therapeutic peptides being in contrast to cyclosporine that did not allow drug incorporation in lipophilic droplets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial dose of Neoral was twice the last daily dose of continuous infusion, and was given in two equally divided doses based on the reported bioavailability of Neoral of about 0.4 (40%) in allogeneic HSCT recipients. 5 On the last day of the continuous infusion of CsA (day À1), the serum CsA concentration was measured at 9:00, 15:00, and 21:00. After the patient was switched to Neoral, the CsA concentration was measured just before (C 0 ), and 1 (C 1 ), 2 (C 2 ), 3 (C 3 ), 4 (C 4 ), 6 (C 6 ), and 12 (C 12 ) hours after the oral administration of Neoral on the first day (day 0) and between day 3 and day 5.…”
Section: Study Schedulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, the appropriateness of this conversion rate has been inconsistent among earlier studies. 5,6 Parquet et al reported that doubling the last intravenous dose provided the best therapeutic range concentration, whereas the concentration/dose ratio was similar in intravenous administration and oral administration and thus, 1:1 conversion seemed appropriate in the McGuire's study. In addition, no data are available regarding the detailed pharmacokinetics in allogeneic HSCT recipients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a model that predicts ciclosporin pharmacokinetics and dose requirements to achieve the desired therapeutic target in an individual HSCT patient would be highly useful. CsA pharmacokinetic studies in HSCT recipients are scarce and most have evaluated only small numbers of subjects [9, [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%