2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New optofluidic based lab-on-a-chip device for the real-time fluoride analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optofluidic sensor platforms are being intensely studied for their unique combination of optical precision and sensitivity and lab-on-a-chip ease-of-use and efficiency [1][2][3]. Many recently reported optofluidic devices exploit the straight-forward integration of optical components (light emitting diodes, lenses, optical filters) and fluidics (microfluidic channels, capillaries, droplets) [4][5][6]. However, some of the most promising optical and fluidic phenomena are not easily integrated, due to incompatibility of physical or chemical constraints, and, when achieved, are anchored to the laboratory by the necessary infrastructure [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optofluidic sensor platforms are being intensely studied for their unique combination of optical precision and sensitivity and lab-on-a-chip ease-of-use and efficiency [1][2][3]. Many recently reported optofluidic devices exploit the straight-forward integration of optical components (light emitting diodes, lenses, optical filters) and fluidics (microfluidic channels, capillaries, droplets) [4][5][6]. However, some of the most promising optical and fluidic phenomena are not easily integrated, due to incompatibility of physical or chemical constraints, and, when achieved, are anchored to the laboratory by the necessary infrastructure [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to produce this sensor family for health care, pathogen detection, and clinical reasons, many fabrication processes have been developed throughout the years. [13][14][15][16] Wearable technology has grown in three phases, according to early studies: a first phase from the 1980s to 1997; a second phase between 1998 and 2000; and a third phase between 2001 and 2004. 17 It is described as follows: the first period is driven by technology, with an emphasis on wearable computing applications; the second is a period of integration with the fashion and textiles sector, with more extensive garment integration; and the third is a period of growth in smart clothing and garment integration in the commercial sector.…”
Section: Wearable Healthcare Devices and Their Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, sensors would be ideal for the detection of these rare CTCs. Currently, several techniques such as flow cytometry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Western blotting, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR), magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and centrifugation techniques, and laserbased technology are widely used for the biomolecular or cellular analysis of cancer [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Although these techniques have several limitations, such as substantial sample consumption, low throughput, lack of real-time monitoring, and high overall operational expenses, there are no other alternative simple techniques available for CTC isolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%