2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New nano-hydroxyapatite in bone defect regeneration: A histological study in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine the new biomaterial HA scaffolds (control) and Cu 5 -HA (i.e., the best result from the in vitro test), suitable skeleton skin defects in a poorly vascularized location ( Figure 2 c) must be established in vivo through the use of appropriate animal models. The in vivo animal model allows for the standardization or elimination of variables that contribute to the success or failure of tissue engineered materials [ 22 ]. Figure 9 a,b demonstrate that no blood vessels formed on the HA and Cu 5 -HA scaffolds after one week of implantation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the new biomaterial HA scaffolds (control) and Cu 5 -HA (i.e., the best result from the in vitro test), suitable skeleton skin defects in a poorly vascularized location ( Figure 2 c) must be established in vivo through the use of appropriate animal models. The in vivo animal model allows for the standardization or elimination of variables that contribute to the success or failure of tissue engineered materials [ 22 ]. Figure 9 a,b demonstrate that no blood vessels formed on the HA and Cu 5 -HA scaffolds after one week of implantation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data indicate that the scaffold has good biocompatibility: human MSCs adhered to and proliferated on the surface of the scaffold, and their metabolic activity was normal. The similarity of the XRD TEM, and BET results of natural bone and collagen fibers mineralized with nanosized HA, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] may explain the biomimetic effect in terms of osteointegration, cell seeding, and formation of new bone. However the hydrophobic PCL could hamper differentiation of MSCs.…”
Section: Biocompatibility: Human Mscs and Hepg2/saos-2 Cells Complemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA), which is composed of the same ions as the major mineral constituent of bone, is an attractive implant material for bone regeneration due to its biocompatibility and osteoconductivity properties. Furthermore, it does not cause systemic toxicity or immunological reactions [13][14][15]. Porous HA scaffolds are used in bone-tissue engineering, as their architecture mimics very closely that of the bone extracellular matrix (bECM), thereby providing a favorable environment for biological processes [16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,12 However, HA do not show any intrinsic bioactivity, and do not induce positive regenerative response from bone cells when implanted. HA has also been shown to have positive effects on bone formation and cell fate in vivo and in vitro.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%