2018
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New method of lung cancer detection by saliva test using surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy

Abstract: Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is a surface‐sensitive technique that enhances Raman scattering by molecules adsorbed on nanostructures. The advantages of using SERS include high detection sensibility and fast analysis, thus it is a potentially promising tool for sensing metabolic cancer molecules in trace amounts. To explore this new method of lung cancer detection, we analyzed saliva samples from 61 lung cancer patients and 66 healthy controls. An SERS system and a nano‐modified chip were used in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Qian et al carried out in 2018, a study using SERS to discriminate 61 lung cancer saliva samples from 66 non-cancer controls [ 20 ]. Twelve peaks that varied significantly from one group to another were identified and attributed mainly to change in protein residues and the content of nucleic acid molecules ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qian et al carried out in 2018, a study using SERS to discriminate 61 lung cancer saliva samples from 66 non-cancer controls [ 20 ]. Twelve peaks that varied significantly from one group to another were identified and attributed mainly to change in protein residues and the content of nucleic acid molecules ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak assignments are listed in Table 3 according to the reported literature. [ 11,14,21–28 ] The HGG and LGG group peak intensity changes compared with the normal group are shown in Table 2. The HGG group had lower intensities than the LGG group at all specific peaks except 749 cm −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated with this, literature reviews of any nature were also excluded from the final systematic analysis (n = 230). Finally, only eight studies were deemed to be fully consistent with the proposed theme [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], including those that did not specifically diagnose oral cancer (n = 3) but used salivary samples for Raman spectroscopy [32,34,35]. Important aspects of each study were also analysed, including the year of the study, sample size, the nature of saliva collection, the physical state of the sample at the time of analysis, the laser wavelength used as source, the use of nanoparticles as enhancers for Raman analysis (SERS), the type of statistical analysis adopted, whether principal components analysis associated with linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) or support vector machines (SVM) were used, and the size of the spectral range analysed (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%