2014
DOI: 10.21608/jfds.2014.52745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Method for Determination of Protein Content of Goat's Milk and Compared With Different Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Total protein was determined using Pyne's method which is known as formaldehyde titration [23]. This method was proven to be having the same accuracy as compared to Kjeldahl method, as the differences were insignificant between protein contents measured by using both methods [24]. The total protein was calculated using factor of 1.74.…”
Section: Physico-chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total protein was determined using Pyne's method which is known as formaldehyde titration [23]. This method was proven to be having the same accuracy as compared to Kjeldahl method, as the differences were insignificant between protein contents measured by using both methods [24]. The total protein was calculated using factor of 1.74.…”
Section: Physico-chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Американские исследователи [3] по результатам измерений 650 образцов молока от 142 коров установили среднее значение коэффициента пересчета 1,77 для проб молока объемом 10 см 3 , для проб молока объемом 20 см 3 -0,885, отметив, что на величину коэффициента пересчета на общий белок оказывали влияние стадия лактации и сезон года. Египетские исследователи [4] для козьего молока применяли коэффициент пересчета, равный 2,505, для 20 см 3 -1,253. Пакистанские ученые [5] установили для буйволиного молока коэффициент 1,9, для 20 см 3 -0,95; для коровьего -1,7, для 20 см 3 -это 0,85.…”
Section: молочная промышленность №2 2024unclassified