2005
DOI: 10.1080/10286630500067846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New media after the Dot.com bust

Abstract: carried out primarily by independent contractors. The use of a multi-skilled contract workforce has increased following the decline in labor demand. In Sweden, New Media workers turned to unions following the downturn to deal with rising unemployment. Germany represents a middle ground case with a largely non-unionized workforce that is, however, influenced by collective industrial relations institutions and norms regarding employer roles. These divergent paths suggest that national policy continues to play a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be explicitly noted that this is not a linear, unproblematic or necessarily successful process -as what also comes to mind when considering the histories of the four case studies in the context of an emerging body of literature on new media work (see, for example, Christopherson and Van Jaarsveld, 2005) are elements of distinct disorganization (Leung, 2005) and disequilibrium (Lovink, 2003) embedded in the praxis of the new media ecosystem. Jenkins acknowledges this as well, shrugging off similar concerns by accepting it as a permanent condition: 'For the foreseeable future, convergence will be a kind of kludge -a jerry-rigged relationship between different media technologies -rather than a fully integrated system ' (2004: 34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be explicitly noted that this is not a linear, unproblematic or necessarily successful process -as what also comes to mind when considering the histories of the four case studies in the context of an emerging body of literature on new media work (see, for example, Christopherson and Van Jaarsveld, 2005) are elements of distinct disorganization (Leung, 2005) and disequilibrium (Lovink, 2003) embedded in the praxis of the new media ecosystem. Jenkins acknowledges this as well, shrugging off similar concerns by accepting it as a permanent condition: 'For the foreseeable future, convergence will be a kind of kludge -a jerry-rigged relationship between different media technologies -rather than a fully integrated system ' (2004: 34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rising rent displaces not only artists but also creative professionals [20,21]. Given this issue, questions are raised regarding the politics involved in the formation of creative groups and their spaces: what is considered creative or innovative and who is benefiting from this process [22,23]? These placesonce bohemian clustersare commoditized or emulated, then transformed into habitats for wealthy Bobos (bohemian bourgeois) [20,21,24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth noting that media work is highly affected by external changes such as regulatory and policy frameworks (Christopherson 2004;Alacovska and Gill 2019;Christopherson and van Jaarsveld 2005), technological transformations (Bartosova 2011;Lewis and Westlund 2015), and audience habits (Villi and Picard 2019;Chua and Westlund 2019;Barrios-Rubio 2021). This means that media work is by no means happening in a vacuum (Dickinson 2007), but the interesting point here is that-as Markova and McKay (2013) argued-these changes are shaping new forms of media work in such a way that workers may benefit from new opportunities (e.g., new ways of community building, more exciting workplaces, new applications of technologies for decision makings, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%