1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-232x.1990.tb00764.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Measures of Union Organizing Effectiveness

Abstract: This study considers the effect of union organizing effort, success and the selection of organizing targets on the potential for union growth. The findings indicate that between 1976 and 1985, union organizing effectiveness declined markedly in the United States and that U.S. unions were less successful in new organizing than Canadian unions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researches argue that a reduction in union organizing activities has partially caused the decline in national union membership (Block, 1980;Dickens and Leonard, 1985;Chaison and Dhavale, 1990;Rose and Chaison, 1990). This claim is disputed by Voos (1984).…”
Section: U T = (New Nlrb Members T )/Labor Force T -Andut_mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some researches argue that a reduction in union organizing activities has partially caused the decline in national union membership (Block, 1980;Dickens and Leonard, 1985;Chaison and Dhavale, 1990;Rose and Chaison, 1990). This claim is disputed by Voos (1984).…”
Section: U T = (New Nlrb Members T )/Labor Force T -Andut_mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This measure indicates the total number of eligible voters in NLRB certification elections in which the union was involved over the five-year period. As Rose and Chaison (1990) noted, a significant part of the decline in U.S. union gains via representation elections is attributable to diminished organizing activity. Thus, although one would not usually treat effort as an indication of effectiveness, there is some justification for doing so in this context.…”
Section: Nlrb Certification Election-based Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Tables 1 and 2, election frequency differed sharply across industries and unions and changed dramatically in recent years. We had no prediction of election frequency impact on win rate and suggested that it might be a proxy for the effects of economies of scale, experience, expertise and, as other researchers have proposed, organizing effort, opportunity, or selectivity in choosing organizing targets (Chaison and Dhavale, 1990b;Rose and Chaison, 1990;and Fiorito et al, 1995).…”
Section: Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 96%