Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Solid Expandable liners have been used extensively over the past 10 years for drilling liners, but rarely as production liners, much less in high risk environments where the expandable liner becomes differentially stuck as soon as it reaches the end of the horizontal hole section. This environment requires the liner to be cemented and expanded in one of the most (if not the most) difficult well conditions it can be subjected. The expandable liners discussed in this paper so far have shown positive field status as production liners. When an expandable liner, that is not differentially stuck, is expanded using a swage it typically "shrinks" in length as it expands in diameter as part of material balance physics. This shrinkage is typically 4 to 6%. That is, if a 1,000 ft liner is expanded 5% in diameter, the expanded length would be reduced to ~950 ft. To compensate for this shrinkage, an additional length of liner is run to ensure that the final length of liner required is delivered. However, when the expandable liner becomes differentially stuck or can not move along the length of the wellbore during expansion, it can not gain the material for its growth in diameter from the liner's length. Therefore, the material is sacrificed within the liner's wall and its connectors. This environment is considered one of the most strenuous a solid expandable liner can be subjected to during expansion. Combining insightful engineering with a stringent qualification regime of the expandable system and the tubulars and connectors that it utilizes, solid expandable production liners can be installed that will service these types of complex wells. While extensive engineering and lab testing of an expandable system is critical, the ultimate testing is in multiple field applications to best develop effective reservoir sweeping of a mature field. Several case histories of field installations will be reviewed. The installation, zonal isolation, and tubular performance of these liners will be evaluated and reviewed using downhole tubular inspection logs, observed installation phenomenon, and performance over time. This empirical data will give the potential end users fundamental knowledge and good case history information on how to best qualify and use solid expandable liners for the ultimate benefit of gaining more oil production and reducing overall well cost. Introduction It is necessary to have a basic knowledge of how solid expandable openhole liners are installed to extract a firm understanding of the information in this paper. While this paper reviews the basics, a host of technical papers and articles expound on the fundamentals of solid expandable liner installation. (Filippov 1999; Dupal 2000; Dupal 2001; Zhou 2004; Furlow 2000) With this foundation of understanding, an explanation of the wellbore environment of these complex wells will be provided. An investigation of the openhole production liner system qualification process will highlight the critical factors that significantly reduce operational risks. This paper probes several factors, specific to the wells of a major operator in Saudi Arabia, prior to and within the installation process that also reduce the end user's risk. Finally, an in-depth study of these several case histories will be examined to provide a deeper understanding through this situational analysis.
Solid Expandable liners have been used extensively over the past 10 years for drilling liners, but rarely as production liners, much less in high risk environments where the expandable liner becomes differentially stuck as soon as it reaches the end of the horizontal hole section. This environment requires the liner to be cemented and expanded in one of the most (if not the most) difficult well conditions it can be subjected. The expandable liners discussed in this paper so far have shown positive field status as production liners. When an expandable liner, that is not differentially stuck, is expanded using a swage it typically "shrinks" in length as it expands in diameter as part of material balance physics. This shrinkage is typically 4 to 6%. That is, if a 1,000 ft liner is expanded 5% in diameter, the expanded length would be reduced to ~950 ft. To compensate for this shrinkage, an additional length of liner is run to ensure that the final length of liner required is delivered. However, when the expandable liner becomes differentially stuck or can not move along the length of the wellbore during expansion, it can not gain the material for its growth in diameter from the liner's length. Therefore, the material is sacrificed within the liner's wall and its connectors. This environment is considered one of the most strenuous a solid expandable liner can be subjected to during expansion. Combining insightful engineering with a stringent qualification regime of the expandable system and the tubulars and connectors that it utilizes, solid expandable production liners can be installed that will service these types of complex wells. While extensive engineering and lab testing of an expandable system is critical, the ultimate testing is in multiple field applications to best develop effective reservoir sweeping of a mature field. Several case histories of field installations will be reviewed. The installation, zonal isolation, and tubular performance of these liners will be evaluated and reviewed using downhole tubular inspection logs, observed installation phenomenon, and performance over time. This empirical data will give the potential end users fundamental knowledge and good case history information on how to best qualify and use solid expandable liners for the ultimate benefit of gaining more oil production and reducing overall well cost. Introduction It is necessary to have a basic knowledge of how solid expandable openhole liners are installed to extract a firm understanding of the information in this paper. While this paper reviews the basics, a host of technical papers and articles expound on the fundamentals of solid expandable liner installation. (Filippov 1999; Dupal 2000; Dupal 2001; Zhou 2004; Furlow 2000) With this foundation of understanding, an explanation of the wellbore environment of these complex wells will be provided. An investigation of the openhole production liner system qualification process will highlight the critical factors that significantly reduce operational risks. This paper probes several factors, specific to the wells of a major operator in Saudi Arabia, prior to and within the installation process that also reduce the end user's risk. Finally, an in-depth study of these several case histories will be examined to provide a deeper understanding through this situational analysis.
Since the introduction almost fifteen years ago of today's solid expandable liner systems, threaded connection technologies have advanced very little compared to the development of sophisticated, state-of-the-art expansion tools and systems. The severity of damage caused to threaded connections during the downhole expansion process leaves some threads unengaged and badly deformed reducing the connections’ mechanical dependability. Even worse, traditional metal seals incorporated into most proprietary premium connections are destroyed during the expansion process or damaged to the point of being undependable. Even though solid expandable liner systems offer a large number of important and valuable solutions, connection performance is obviously a problem. For more than a decade, engineers have worked on the development of connection features that are more resistant to damage caused during expansion. Although there has been some advancement, today most or all expanded connections today share little resemblance to unexpanded connections when subjected to ISO 13679 qualification tests with gas. This paper details new expansion cone technology that eliminates the majority of damage caused to connections when expanded with traditional cones. This paper will provide Finite Element Analyses and physical testing verification to show how this new technology leaves connections with minimal visible damage to the threads and metal seals after expansion.
Summary Since the introduction almost 15 years ago of today's solid-expandable-liner systems, threaded-connection technologies have advanced very little compared with the development of sophisticated, state-of-the-art expansion tools and systems. The severity of damage caused to threaded connections during the downhole expansion process leaves some threads unengaged and badly deformed, reducing the connections’ mechanical dependability. Even worse, traditional metal seals incorporated into most proprietary premium connections are destroyed during the expansion process or damaged to the point of being undependable. Even though solid-expandable-liner systems offer a large number of important and valuable solutions, connection performance is obviously a problem. For more than a decade, engineers have worked on the development of connection features that are more resistant to damage caused during expansion. Although there has been some advancement, today most or all expanded connections share little resemblance to unexpanded connections when subjected to ISO 13679 (2002) qualification tests with gas. This paper details new expansion-cone technology that eliminates the majority of damage caused to connections when expanded with traditional cones. This paper will provide finite-element analyses and physical-testing verification to show how this new technology leaves connections with minimal visible damage to the threads and metal seals after expansion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.