2017
DOI: 10.3390/rel8020016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Interdisciplinary Spaces of Religions and Beliefs in Contemporary Thought and Practice: An Analysis

Abstract: This article is rooted in the observation that the 21st century has witnessed a resurgent interest in and a new visibility of religions and beliefs across a range of arts, humanities and social science disciplines, some of which have always focused on religions and beliefs, others are returning to it, while some have no previous tradition of doing so. The article reports on an analysis of these new spaces of interest in religions and beliefs, undertaken through semi-structured interviews with eighteen landmark… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Post-secularisation (Baker 2019;Beaumont and Eder 2019;McClymont 2019) and the resurgence/visibility of religion (Baker and Dinham 2017;Martínez-Ariño 2019) created significant spatial manifestations in cities around the globe (Hancock and Srinivas 2008;Holloway and Valins 2002;Luz 2015;Wilford 2012). In the UK since 1980, the emergence of 7,000 new churches created significant 'spatial impacts/challenges' (Greed 2016a).…”
Section: Religion-planning Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-secularisation (Baker 2019;Beaumont and Eder 2019;McClymont 2019) and the resurgence/visibility of religion (Baker and Dinham 2017;Martínez-Ariño 2019) created significant spatial manifestations in cities around the globe (Hancock and Srinivas 2008;Holloway and Valins 2002;Luz 2015;Wilford 2012). In the UK since 1980, the emergence of 7,000 new churches created significant 'spatial impacts/challenges' (Greed 2016a).…”
Section: Religion-planning Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 'theological turn' in the broader field of organisation and management scholarship has only recently recognised religion's significance in organisational life (Baker and Dinham 2017;Dyck 2014;Herzog et al 2020;Tracey et al 2014). Scholars now contend that religious faith and values underpin both economic behaviour (McVea and Naughton 2021;Smith et al , 2021 and social action directed at alleviating poverty and inequality (e.g., Greenwood et al 2010;Gümüsay 2020;Zhao and Lounsbury 2016).…”
Section: An Institutional Logic Of Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Religion is a group phenomenon involving group norms that specify beliefs, attitudes, values, and behaviours relating to both sacred and secular aspects of life, which are integrated and imbued with meaning by an ideological framework and worldview. (Hogg et al 2010, p. 73) Until recently, religion and its expression in organisational life have received less scholarly attention from organisation and management scholars than the market and community institutional orders (Baker and Dinham 2017;Dyck 2014;Herzog et al 2020;Tracey et al 2014). Religion is unique among the societal-level institutional orders since religion influences the market, corporation, professional, state, family and community (or social welfare) orders and the logics that arise from them (Thornton et al 2012).…”
Section: An Institutional Logic Of Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canda and Furman (2010; but see also Holloway and Moss, 2010) attempt to address this, with an interdisciplinary framework of values, knowledge, skills, and evidence for “spiritually sensitive practice”, using the language of spirituality but not religion. This has been criticised for concealing the real challenge through use of “apologetic proxies” (Dinham and Baker, 2017). Gilligan’s judgement of the situation in the UK is that practitioners are still able to “continue with ‘religion-blind’ and ‘belief-blind’” approaches without these being significantly challenged by agency policies or by professional cultures” (Gilligan, 2009, p. 94).…”
Section: Existing Knowledge and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second critical frame is the notion of religious literacy, and this should underpin research questions and analysis in four domains, rooted in earlier careful scholarship to induce, test and refine the idea of religious literacy in the HE sector, and in schools. This has resulted in a religious literacy framework (Dinham and Baker, 2017), which challenges settings to consider themselves in relation to religion and belief in four ways.…”
Section: An Emerging Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%