2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.newast.2005.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New fundamental parameters for the inner disk open cluster Lyngå 11

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the cluster density profile with those of other clusters observed using both the same CCD and the same telescope, having previously normalized the respective field star densities. We found that NGC 2489 has an intermediate star density, like NGC 2194 (Piatti et al 2003a), NGC 2324 (Piatti et al 2004b), Tombaugh 1 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2004c) and Lyngå 11 (Piatti et al 2006a), which are between the highest density clusters NGC 6318 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2005) and Tr 5 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2004a) and the lowest density cluster NGC 5288 (Piatti et al 2006b). Regarding the shape of the NGC 2489 density profile, it compares well at the core with those of clusters of intermediate star densities, but shows additionally a corona not so extended as that of NGC 5288.…”
Section: Data Handlingmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared the cluster density profile with those of other clusters observed using both the same CCD and the same telescope, having previously normalized the respective field star densities. We found that NGC 2489 has an intermediate star density, like NGC 2194 (Piatti et al 2003a), NGC 2324 (Piatti et al 2004b), Tombaugh 1 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2004c) and Lyngå 11 (Piatti et al 2006a), which are between the highest density clusters NGC 6318 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2005) and Tr 5 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2004a) and the lowest density cluster NGC 5288 (Piatti et al 2006b). Regarding the shape of the NGC 2489 density profile, it compares well at the core with those of clusters of intermediate star densities, but shows additionally a corona not so extended as that of NGC 5288.…”
Section: Data Handlingmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In some cases, BVI photometry proved to be a valuable tool for obtaining the fundamental parameters of star clusters, since information on cluster membership, distance, reddening and age is obtained through the analysis of ( V , B − V ) and ( V , V − I ) colour–magnitude diagrams (CMDs; see e.g. Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2006a,b). In other cases, CCD photometric data obtained with the Johnson V and Kron–Cousins I filters were supplemented with CCD or photoelectric Washington photometric data to determine the cluster fundamental parameters and, mainly, to estimate cluster metal content (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the stellar density radial profile of NGC 2236 with those of other open clusters we observed using both the same CCD and telescope: NGC 2194 (Piatti et al 2003a); Tr 5 (Piatti et al 2004a); NGC 2324 (Piatti et al 2004b); Tombaugh 1 (Piatti et al 2004c); NGC 6318 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2005); Lyngå 11 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2006a); NGC 5288 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2006b) and NGC 2489 (Piatti et al 2007). We previously normalized these cluster profiles to the distance and field star density of NGC 2236, and expressed the stellar densities in units of number of stars per square parsec.…”
Section: Structural Cluster Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal is to obtain good‐quality charge‐coupled device (CCD) photometric data, not only to produce a larger sample of studied open clusters, but also to determine their fundamental parameters accurately, using the most recent family of theoretical isochrones. We have already reported results on the relatively young clusters NGC 2194, 2324 and 6318 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2003a, 2004a, 2005a), on the Hyades‐like cluster Lyngå 11 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2006), on the intermediate‐age clusters NGC 2627 and Tombaugh 1 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2003b, 2004b), and on the old, metal‐poor anticentre cluster Trumpler 5 (Piatti, Clariá & Ahumada 2004c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%