2018
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New formula and conversion factor to compute basic wood density of tree species using a global wood technology database

Abstract: In carbon cycle research, tree wood density is used to compute forest carbon stock and assess the role of forests in mitigating climate change (Pan et al., 2011;Vieilledent et al., 2016) or evaluate the impact of deforestation on climate (Achard et al., 2014). In community ecology, wood density is a proxy for species performance (Lachenbruch and McCulloh, 2014), reflecting a trade-off between growth potential and mortality risk from biomechanical or hydraulic failure (Díaz et al., 2016). Fast-growing, short-li… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual observations were complimented by species level observations from existing databases such as the global wood density database (Zanne et al, ), the global parenchyma database (Morris et al, ) and the RAINFOR Amazon‐wide tree biomass and tree growth databases (Coelho de Souza et al, ; Fauset et al, ). Also the wood density databases of the Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD) and of The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) were consulted (Vieilledent et al, ). The core dataset counts 11956 entries of individual observations on 3909 species from 902 genera and 155 plant families that were retrieved from 346 published studies conducted at 110 sites in Central and South America.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individual observations were complimented by species level observations from existing databases such as the global wood density database (Zanne et al, ), the global parenchyma database (Morris et al, ) and the RAINFOR Amazon‐wide tree biomass and tree growth databases (Coelho de Souza et al, ; Fauset et al, ). Also the wood density databases of the Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD) and of The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) were consulted (Vieilledent et al, ). The core dataset counts 11956 entries of individual observations on 3909 species from 902 genera and 155 plant families that were retrieved from 346 published studies conducted at 110 sites in Central and South America.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species growth form was largely derived from the plant growth form dataset for the New World(Engemann et al, 2016). The taxonomic status of the original genus and species names were assessed using The Plant List-version 1.1 (http:// www.theplantlist.org) in the R package Taxonstand (Cayuela, Granzow-de la Cerda, Albuquerque, & Golicher, 2012) and the original genus and species names were replaced by the accepted names when necessary.Individual observations were complimented by species level observations from existing databases such as the global wood density database, the global parenchyma database and the RAINFOR Amazon-wide tree biomass and tree growth databases(Coelho de Souza et al, 2016;Fauset et al, 2015).Also the wood density databases of the Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD) and of The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) were consulted(Vieilledent et al, 2018). The core dataset counts 11956 entries of individual observations on 3909 species from 902 genera and 155 plant families that were retrieved from 346 published studies conducted at 110 sites in Central and South America.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, when we used values from the Global Wood Density Database [41], error increased to 9 %. We note however that a recent study highlighted values in this database might overstate some entries by approximately 3 %, which could partly explain some of these differences [45].…”
Section: The More Tricky Issue Of Densitymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Biologists prefer to refer to basic density (BD), which is the ratio of anhydrous mass to green volume, two measures that are independent of the free water content of the green wood. A proportional relationship can be defined between these two density parameters: BD=0.828×D 12 (Vieilledent et al, 2018), with fairly good precision for all species.…”
Section: Normal and Special Maturation Forcesmentioning
confidence: 91%