2008
DOI: 10.4135/9788132101390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Forms of Urban Governance in India: Shifts, Models, Networks and Contestations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brokers have become regular protagonists in the literature on clientelistic politics, which highlights how politicians rely on brokers to provide voters with preferential access to state resources in exchange for electoral support (Stokes et al 2013). Brokers also figure increasingly often in studies on public service provision and local governance, which highlight the way in which informal machination by brokers often ends up distorting the impact of state policies (Veron et al 2003;Baud and de Wit 2008). Brokers make further appearances in studies on the 'anthropology of the state' , which highlight their importance in shaping the ways in which citizens experience the 'everyday state' (Fuller and Bénéï 2001;Corbridge et al 2005).…”
Section: Brokerage and Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brokers have become regular protagonists in the literature on clientelistic politics, which highlights how politicians rely on brokers to provide voters with preferential access to state resources in exchange for electoral support (Stokes et al 2013). Brokers also figure increasingly often in studies on public service provision and local governance, which highlight the way in which informal machination by brokers often ends up distorting the impact of state policies (Veron et al 2003;Baud and de Wit 2008). Brokers make further appearances in studies on the 'anthropology of the state' , which highlight their importance in shaping the ways in which citizens experience the 'everyday state' (Fuller and Bénéï 2001;Corbridge et al 2005).…”
Section: Brokerage and Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For India, this is highlighted by the malfunctioning ward committees (Baud & de Wit 2009, Kennedy 2009) and in Pakistan, by the lack of accountability of local representatives (Cheema et al 2005). continuity with a phenomenon observed with regularity since the 1960s (Kumar 2006, Sivaramakrishnan 2000.…”
Section: Governance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, when it deals with parochial issues, without having a city‐wide perspective, it falls into a ‘local trap’ (Purcell, 2006). By enhancing a local dimension of governance, participation is prone to capture by elites or political parties and patronage networks, resulting in an increase in patronage (Baud and de Wit, 2009; Harriss, 2007). 3…”
Section: Retracing the ‘Participatory Governance’ Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the provision of urban services, reliance on privatization to large companies is limited (Zérah, 2006). Reforms have focused on different kinds of partnerships, often relying on small companies (Baud and de Wit, 2009). Public sector reform is underway, but the influence of new public management is overlaid by specific South Asian management features (Davis, 2004).…”
Section: Participatory Governance and Urban Services In Mumbaimentioning
confidence: 99%