New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges

Abstract

The regional innovation system (RIS) approach has become a widely used framework for examining the dynamics of innovation across space and for crafting policies to promote the innovation capacity of regions. The dominant focus has been on technological and business innovation enhancing competitiveness and economic growth. In light of persistent environmental and social challenges such as climate change, aging and growing inequalities, this understanding appears to be too narrow. We argue that the RIS approach requires a critical reassessment for informing the next generation of regional innovation policies. We explore how RIS scholarship and policies could benefit from an alternative understanding of the innovation process. Inspired by recent work on mission-oriented and transformative innovation policies, we develop the notion of 'challenge-oriented RISs' (CoRISs). In contrast to conventional understandings of RISs, this approach embraces a more critical view of innovation, captures the directionality of change, opens up to new innovation actors at different territorial scales and pays more attention to the application side and upscaling of innovation within the region and beyond. Acknowledging that regions vary in their capacity for transformative change and challenge-oriented innovation, the article outlines new directions for place-based innovation policies.

The Roles of Knowledge Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions and Digitalization: Academia-Driven Fostering of Socio-Technical Transitions?

“…Therefore, research on sustainability transitions has discussed the multi-level interactions of various actors and their effects on system innovation (Geels 2002;Geels 2005;Markard et al 2012;Köhler et al 2019). Recently, spatial analyses have contributed to a remarkable body of literature (Hansen and Coenen 2015;Strambach and Pflitsch 2018;Tödtling et al 2021) that argues that a regional scale is the scale best suited for creating comprehensive approaches to regional challenges and the associated demands of actors (Hansen and Coenen 2015).…”

The promise of living labs to the Quadruple Helix stakeholders: exploring the sources of (dis)satisfaction

“…The RIS concept has been used as a framework to analyse the differential innovativeness of regions (Asheim, Isaksen, and Trippl 2019), inspiring regional innovation policy questioning 'one size fits all' policy solutions (Tödtling and Trippl 2005). Several authors have called for more place-based and inclusive innovation processes where a variety of agents collaborate towards regional development (Tödtling, Trippl, and Desch 2021). Considering that LLs have become popular policy instruments, the more diverse participants in RISs there are, the more likely various expectations from LLs they hold.…”

Innovation in Peripheral Regions from a Multidimensional Perspective: Evidence from the Middle Pomerania Region in Poland

“…Rather, it seeks to use existing strengths, often locally hidden opportunities, to create new systems and mechanisms for economic growth and the competitive advantages based on them. The need to choose smart specializations is dictated by the specific conditions of EU regions with different development potential, determining the socio-economic and institutional structures [5,[10][11][12].…”