2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New diagnostic SNP molecular markers for the Mytilus species complex

Abstract: The development of diagnostic markers has been a long-standing interest of population geneticists as it allows clarification of taxonomic uncertainties. Historically, there has been much debate on the taxonomic status of species belonging to the Mytilus species complex (M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis and M. trossulus), and whether they are discrete species. We analysed reference pure specimens of M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis and M. trossulus, using Restriction site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing and ident… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
60
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
60
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected for mostly non-model species, the present study highlights a general paucity of published mitochondrial and nuclear genome assemblies, population-scale data, as well as geographical metadata submitted to barcode databases (BOLD, GenBank), with some mollusk populations better described at the population genomic level, i.e., Crassostrea sp., Mytilus sp., Haliotis sp., and Pecten sp. (Zbawicka et al, 2014a(Zbawicka et al, , 2018Fraïsse et al, 2016;Mathiesen et al, 2016;Wenne et al, 2016;Gutierrez et al, 2017;Harney et al, 2018;Wilson et al, 2018;El Ayari et al, 2019;Masonbrink et al, 2019;Paterno et al, 2019;Vendrami et al, 2019a,b). It is worth noting that the phylogenetically robust data reported here significantly increases the number of released complete mitochondrial genome sequences by 6-fold for R. decussatus, five-fold for R. philippinarum, three-fold for A. islandica, and D. polymorpha, and finally two-fold for H. rufescens, H. tuberculata, and P. maximus.…”
Section: Limits Associated With the Availability Of Modern Mollusk Dnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected for mostly non-model species, the present study highlights a general paucity of published mitochondrial and nuclear genome assemblies, population-scale data, as well as geographical metadata submitted to barcode databases (BOLD, GenBank), with some mollusk populations better described at the population genomic level, i.e., Crassostrea sp., Mytilus sp., Haliotis sp., and Pecten sp. (Zbawicka et al, 2014a(Zbawicka et al, , 2018Fraïsse et al, 2016;Mathiesen et al, 2016;Wenne et al, 2016;Gutierrez et al, 2017;Harney et al, 2018;Wilson et al, 2018;El Ayari et al, 2019;Masonbrink et al, 2019;Paterno et al, 2019;Vendrami et al, 2019a,b). It is worth noting that the phylogenetically robust data reported here significantly increases the number of released complete mitochondrial genome sequences by 6-fold for R. decussatus, five-fold for R. philippinarum, three-fold for A. islandica, and D. polymorpha, and finally two-fold for H. rufescens, H. tuberculata, and P. maximus.…”
Section: Limits Associated With the Availability Of Modern Mollusk Dnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High resolution, hypervariable nuclear markers such as microsatellites are typically of low densities and of difficult isolation in molluscs (Cruz et al, 2005;McInerney et al, 2011) and the use of mitochondrial markers is complicated by the doubly uniparental inheritance (DUI) of these organelles in mussels (Skibinski et al, 1994;Zouros et al, 1994). To overcome these limits, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have started to be developed as markers in Mytilus spp., and they have been successfully used to differentiate species and populations within taxa in native and non-native areas (Zbawicka et al, 2012(Zbawicka et al, , 2018Gardner et al, 2016;Larraín et al, 2018;Wilson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this method is the most common DNA-based technique for identifying mussel species. Of course, Me15-16 alone is not able to distinguish introgressed individuals 40 , and also, is not able to differentiate M. chilensis from the Southern Hemisphere lineage of M. galloprovincialis from New Zealand, because in both species, this fragment of genome is not cut by Aci I due to the substitution of the allele “G” by “T” in the restriction site 97 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of genotyping-by-sequencing methods to affordably discover and genotype hundreds or even thousands of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers makes it possible to apply a multi-locus approach to specimen identification 40,101 . New multi-locus SNP panels have been developed recently, allowing for species identification using only the most informative SNPs 38,40,96,102–105 . As an example of the multi-locus approach in mixed populations, hybrids and introgressed individuals were detected by a new twelve-SNP diagnostic panel in European Mytilus samples previously analyzed with PCR-RFLP Me15-16 40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation