2020
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unveiling the Ecological Applications of Ancient DNA From Mollusk Shells

Abstract: The shells of marine mollusks represent promising metagenomic archives of the past, adding to bones, teeth, hairs, and environmental samples most commonly examined in ancient DNA research. Seminal work has established that DNA recovery from marine mollusk shells depends on their microstructure, preservation and disease state, and that authentic ancient DNA could be retrieved from specimens as old as 7,000 years. Here, we significantly push the temporal limit for shell DNA recovery to ≥100,000 years with the su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a set of 25 worked coral samples, we evaluated which one of five candidate DNA extraction protocols is most suited to retrieve DNA from worked precious coral samples. Each of the five tested methods (abbreviated as "W", "F", "B", "E", "Y") have earlier proven to be useful in extracting DNA from biomineralized material 29,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] . DNA was extracted from each of the 25 worked coral skeletal samples with all five techniques, and DNA purity and quantity were assessed using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) technology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a set of 25 worked coral samples, we evaluated which one of five candidate DNA extraction protocols is most suited to retrieve DNA from worked precious coral samples. Each of the five tested methods (abbreviated as "W", "F", "B", "E", "Y") have earlier proven to be useful in extracting DNA from biomineralized material 29,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] . DNA was extracted from each of the 25 worked coral skeletal samples with all five techniques, and DNA purity and quantity were assessed using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) technology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oskam and Bunce 45 "Y" method subfossil bones 46 , subfossil and modern clam shells 47,48 EDTA solution with N-laurylsarcosyl and Proteinase-K…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'ancient' DNA that remains in molluscan shells and other material, including subfossil and museum species, also has the potential to transform our study of the past ecological and evolutionary dynamics. In this latter respect, several new studies have provided successful proof-of-principle [155][156][157]. While the methods for the extraction of ancient DNA have been available for some time, improved and cheaper sequencing technologies have enabled substantial recent progress in the insights that can be generated from this DNA.…”
Section: Improved Extraction Of High-molecular Weight Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive eDNA sampling using natural substrates is a promising solution to overcome filtration challenges. Organisms such as marine sponges (Mariani et al, 2019), molluscs (Der Sarkissian et al, 2020) and biofilms (Rivera et al, 2021) can trap and accumulate eDNA particles in water. Minerals can also accumulate and protect DNA from enzymatic degradation (Alvarez et al, 1998;Levy-Booth et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%