2014
DOI: 10.3140/bull.geosci.1480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Cricetodontini from the middle Miocene of Europe: an example of mosaic evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new magnetostratigraphic interpretation is consistent with biostratigraphic evidence (Ló pez- Guerrero et al, 2013Guerrero et al, , 2014 from the nearby, magnetostratigraphically calibrated sections of Paje and the Aragon type (Krijgsman et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The new magnetostratigraphic interpretation is consistent with biostratigraphic evidence (Ló pez- Guerrero et al, 2013Guerrero et al, , 2014 from the nearby, magnetostratigraphically calibrated sections of Paje and the Aragon type (Krijgsman et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…During the last decade a new intensive investigation of Cricetodontini has been undertaken in Europe with more detailed morphology being presented (López-Guerrero et al 2008, 2014a, b, 2015, López-Antoñanzas and Mein 2009. In the present paper the author gives an accurate description which is comparable with the publications cited above.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…decedens (Schaub, 1925) (from López-Antoñanzas and Mein, 2011), ( 4 ) Deperetomys hagni (from Marković et al, 2020), ( 5 ) Cricetodon sansaniensis (from López-Guerrero, 2014), ( 6 ) C . nievei (from López-Guerrero et al, 2014), ( 7 ) Byzantinia pikermiensis de Bruijn, 1976 (from Ünay et al, 2006), ( 8 ) Eumyarion bifidus Fahlbusch, 1964 (from de Bruijn, 2009), ( 9 ) Gobicricetodon arshanensis Qiu and Li, 2016 (from Qiu and Li, 2016). Illustrations not to scale.
Figure 6.Micro CT cross-sectional scans of Pliotomodon primitivus ( 1 ) holotype maxilla UCMP 36030 and ( 2 ) mandible UCMP 37535 showing number and position of roots.
Figure 7.Comparison of ( 1 ) Pliotomodon primitivus molars with those of ( 2 ) Miotomodon mayi Korth, 2011 (from Korth, 2011), ( 3 ) Repomys gustelyi May, 1981 (from May, 1981), ( 4 ) Galushamys redingtonensis (this study; see Fig.
…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%