2000
DOI: 10.1109/22.826831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New computation of the resonant frequency of a tunable equilateral triangular microstrip patch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are logical comparing with those of reference [10] for a rectangular patch antenna having the same parameters (patch surface and substrate thickness) using the moment method. Noting that, both rectangular and triangular microstrip antennas have generally the same behaviour and radiation characteristics [11], with some differences on the values of the resonant frequency, this must be improved in the following section.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are logical comparing with those of reference [10] for a rectangular patch antenna having the same parameters (patch surface and substrate thickness) using the moment method. Noting that, both rectangular and triangular microstrip antennas have generally the same behaviour and radiation characteristics [11], with some differences on the values of the resonant frequency, this must be improved in the following section.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and f gy represent, respectively, the values: measured [15,18], calculated by this method, given by Bahl and Bhartia [1], given by Helszajn and James [14], given by Garg and Long [16], given by Gang [17], given by using the method of moments (MoM) [18], given by using the curvefitting formula based on the data set obtained from the MoM [18], given by Guney [19], given by Kumprasert and Kiranon [21], given by Guney [20], given by Karaboga et al [22], given by using artificial neural network (ANN) [23], given by Karaboga et al [24], and given by Gurel and Yazgan [27]. The sum of the absolute errors between the theoretical and experimental results in Table I for every method is listed in Table III.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the training data sets are too cumbersome, this may cause overfitting and training may take quite a long time. The internal structure of the ANFIS model does not nec- [24] f gy [27] Total absolute deviations from the measured data (MHz) essarily reflect the real physical relationship between the inputs and outputs. Hence, no understanding of the underlying physical relationship can be gained by analyzing the internal structure of the ANFIS model.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all triangular geometry only equilateral shape has been widely investigated by the researchers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Other geometry like right angle isosceles triangular patch antenna (RAITPA) is least investigated till now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%