2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10644-007-9020-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New capital accumulation in transition economies: implications for capital-labor and capital-output ratios

Abstract: Capital accumulation, Transition economies, Foreign direct investment, Economic growth,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bah and Brada (2009) consider different studies and conclude that the decline in the capital stock in the early transition period was about 50%. Izyumov and Vahaly (2006) report figures between 15 and 50% of the capital stock. Campos and Coricelli (2002, p. 806) simply state: 'We do not know much about what happened to communist capital.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bah and Brada (2009) consider different studies and conclude that the decline in the capital stock in the early transition period was about 50%. Izyumov and Vahaly (2006) report figures between 15 and 50% of the capital stock. Campos and Coricelli (2002, p. 806) simply state: 'We do not know much about what happened to communist capital.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implied misallocations could accumulate over time (Brada, 1989; Estrin, Gelb, & Singh, 1995). Still, Izyumov and Vahaly (2006) argue that despite these tendencies, capital accumulation in central planning was lagging behind Western European countries in both levels and growth rates (see also Campos and Coricelli, 2002as well as Vonyo, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%