2019
DOI: 10.1123/jsm.2018-0218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Brands: Contextual Differences and Development of Brand Associations Over Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Table 2, the factor structure is very clear, with no significant cross-loadings. This factor structural partially confirms those proposed by Kunkel et al (2014; Daniels et al , 2019) and Gladden and Funk (2001, 2002). However, new brand associations and elements were revealed in this research such as elite-sportsmanship participants and elite refereeing associations .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As seen in Table 2, the factor structure is very clear, with no significant cross-loadings. This factor structural partially confirms those proposed by Kunkel et al (2014; Daniels et al , 2019) and Gladden and Funk (2001, 2002). However, new brand associations and elements were revealed in this research such as elite-sportsmanship participants and elite refereeing associations .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This research was based on a review of literature from previous studies that identified brand associations present in consumers' minds for other sports brands such as teams, leagues and competitions (Daniels et al , 2019; Maderer et al , 2016; Yildiz, 2016; Kunkel et al , 2014; Bauer et al , 2008; Ross et al , 2008; Ross et al , 2006; Gladden and Funk 2001, 2002). Initially, 19 items related to brand associations for the UCL emerged and also nine items to examine brand loyalty.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations