2021
DOI: 10.1080/0965254x.2021.1922489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing the same things differently: exploring the unique brand associations linked to women’s professional sport teams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These responses have been evoked through issues including the ongoing struggle of women's teams/leagues to obtain equal/equitable remuneration and treatment (Andersen & Loland, 2017;Fujak et al, 2021;Hendrick, 2016;Taylor et al, 2020), the tenuous and precarious nature (job security) of athlete's contracts (Pavlidis, 2020;Willson et al, 2018), and questions about the longer term sustainability of women's sport leagues (Allison, 2016). Doyle et al (2021) also noted that in Australia the vast majority of women's teams compete under the same brand identity as their male counterparts, "consistent with how many European sport organizations position their women's teams" (p. 2) at the team level. This conflation of women's and men's domains can be problematic as "when women participate in sports, they continue to be constructed as different and evaluated by a masculine standard, which reinforces male dominance and renders women as less-than" (Antunovic & Hardin, 2015, p. 663).…”
Section: Context and Conceptual Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These responses have been evoked through issues including the ongoing struggle of women's teams/leagues to obtain equal/equitable remuneration and treatment (Andersen & Loland, 2017;Fujak et al, 2021;Hendrick, 2016;Taylor et al, 2020), the tenuous and precarious nature (job security) of athlete's contracts (Pavlidis, 2020;Willson et al, 2018), and questions about the longer term sustainability of women's sport leagues (Allison, 2016). Doyle et al (2021) also noted that in Australia the vast majority of women's teams compete under the same brand identity as their male counterparts, "consistent with how many European sport organizations position their women's teams" (p. 2) at the team level. This conflation of women's and men's domains can be problematic as "when women participate in sports, they continue to be constructed as different and evaluated by a masculine standard, which reinforces male dominance and renders women as less-than" (Antunovic & Hardin, 2015, p. 663).…”
Section: Context and Conceptual Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes but is not limited to women of color, queer women, women with disabilities, women representing religious minorities, and women from lower social classes (45,(53)(54)(55)(56)(57). The premise is that women's sport typically favors women with privilege and power (45,52,59), so when women who lack these structural advantages participate, they are challenging the norms of women's sport. As such, for example, when a woman athlete holds a marginalized racial or ethnic identity, everyday resistance within women's sport is more likely to manifest (5,6).…”
Section: Everyday Resistance Within Women's Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, what meaning do fans make of women’s sport [c.f. ( 1 , 2 , 59 )]? How do they understand everyday resistance within women’s sport?…”
Section: Everyday Resistance In Future Women’s Sport Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, men's sport has long profited from numerous social, historical, and economic conditions which have not been equitably extended to women's sport (Delia, 2020). Similarly, women's sport brands which are parallel to the same men's brand within a portfolio in some cases are 100 years younger (e.g., Doyle et al, 2021). Research is needed to determine how sport brands can grow across various stages of their lifecycle to produce impacts at the brand and portfolio level, as well as how introductions, changes, or removals of brands from within a portfolio impact consumers (Hasaan et al, 2021).…”
Section: [Insert Figure 5 Approximately Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%