New Australian Working Time Minimum Standards: Reproducing the Same Old Gendered Architecture?

Abstract

This article focuses on the minimum working time standards in the 'safety net' created by the Fair Work Act 2009. We draw on an analysis of on-paper minima in the 10 National Employment Standards and in two Modern Awards covering paid care workers. We argue that the gendered legacy of poorer working time provisions in non-standard jobs held by many Australian women workers has been reproduced in the architecture of the new Fair Work regime. Our case study suggests that the permanent full-time norm of employment continues to permeate working time regulation, despite the fragmentation of the standard employment relationship with the growth in casual and part-time work. Not only does casual status limit the access of many women workers to particular National Employment Standards, but there remain significant and gendered differences in award minimum working time standards, particularly for casual and part-time care workers, in comparison with the conditions and protections provided in one of the key male industry awards. Further, a hierarchy of working time standards for care workers has been reproduced, underpinned by differences in contract status, job classification and work location. This leaves those at the bottom of this hierarchy with little working time or income security.

Government Funding, Employment Conditions, and Work Organization in Non‐profit Community Services: A Comparative Study

“…Pay increases provided to CharityAus and others in the sector apply to base minimum rates only which are phased inover eight years from December 2012, with insufficient mechanisms to prevent the slow erosion of the value of wages in the sector (Cortis and Meagher ). Moreover, protections against employers turning to casualized labour have been reportedly degraded over time in the Australian community services sector, allowing organizations to get a ‘casual‐like numerical flexibility’ from staff (Charlesworth and Heron , p. 177); trends that may be exacerbated by employers seeking not to pay the new award. Each country was also moving towards individualization of social care.…”

Scheduling longer working lives for older aged care workers: A time and income capability approach

“…In addition to Jenny's analysis here, we might note that an absence of formal obligations for employers to negotiate schedules with workers (Charlesworth and Heron, 2012), leaves managers with little incentive to facilitate a more deliberative rostering arrangement. Whatever the reason, the uncertain rostering practices diminished workers' autonomy to plan their time and their capacity to look after themselves and others.…”

“…However, other 'flexible' rostering arrangements that do not apply in future weeks can be made without written notice. HCWs, who work under the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry award are not entitled to any written notice -only to be 'informed' about their working hours (Charlesworth and Heron, 2012). These employment conditions amount to casualised part-time work, with workers adhering to what is effectively a casual work schedule without the 25% wage loading paid to casual employees (Campbell et al, 2019).…”

The life cycle of women’s employment in Australia and inequality markers

“…The growth of women's employment has emerged hand in hand with increasing part-time work availability, of which women do the majority (nearly 70% of parttime jobs in 2018 were held by women, resulting in just under half of women in the labour market being engaged in part-time work (ABS, 2018c). Much part-time work is also insecure: 53.5% is casual whereas only 11% of full-time work is (ABS, 2017b) and permanent parttime jobs in feminised industries have more unpredictable hours (Charlesworth and Heron, 2012). Men's engagement in part-time work has also increased from a very small base to account for 17% of men in paid work (ABS, 2018c).…”