2014
DOI: 10.1071/zo14091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approaches to cataloguing and understanding evolutionary diversity: a perspective from Australian herpetology

Abstract: Species are a fundamental unit for all fields of biology but conceptual and practical limitations have hampered the process of identifying and describing species in many organismal groups. One outcome of these challenges is the accumulation of genetically divergent lineages and morphologically distinctive populations that are 'known', but remain of uncertain taxonomic status and evolutionary significance. These lineages are also currently not effectively incorporated into evolutionary studies or conservation p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Available evidence indicates that the isolation of the majority of endemic vertebrate taxa in the Central Ranges of Australia probably postdates the onset of the Pliocene, although a small number of generally specialized lizard taxa (including the new species we describe herein) show evidence of deeper Miocene divergences. Similar deeply divergent and biogeographically significant, but overlooked, relict lineages continue to be discovered in arid and seasonally arid biomes across several major landmasses [11,12,6770]. In many of these taxa a close association with geological landforms that provide stable and protected microhabitats appears to be one key factor underpinning their persistence at very local scales, over long timescales and through major climatic changes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Available evidence indicates that the isolation of the majority of endemic vertebrate taxa in the Central Ranges of Australia probably postdates the onset of the Pliocene, although a small number of generally specialized lizard taxa (including the new species we describe herein) show evidence of deeper Miocene divergences. Similar deeply divergent and biogeographically significant, but overlooked, relict lineages continue to be discovered in arid and seasonally arid biomes across several major landmasses [11,12,6770]. In many of these taxa a close association with geological landforms that provide stable and protected microhabitats appears to be one key factor underpinning their persistence at very local scales, over long timescales and through major climatic changes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Globally, ongoing integrated assessments of evolutionary diversity in many orders of life (including vertebrates) continue to reaffirm that biodiversity remains seriously underestimated (Pfenninger & Schwenk, ; Vieites et al ., ; Poulin, ; Pawlowski et al ., ; Adams et al ., ). Taxonomically unrecognized and often morphologically cryptic taxa pose major challenges for evolutionary biologists and conservation management (Bickford et al ., ; Oliver et al ., ). While in most cases assessments of cryptic diversity are taxonomically focused, at least theoretically, where evolutionary processes such as refugial dynamics and allopatric diversification are acting in concert across landscapes, geographically concordant clusters of unrecognized diversity in unrelated lineages may go undetected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Documenting and describing morphologically similar, yet genetically and evolutionarily distinctive cryptic species poses well-recognised, but ongoing challenges for systematists, evolutionary biologists and conservation managers (Bickford et al, 2007;Oliver, Keogh & Moritz, 2015;Singhal et al, 2018). The existence of multiple species within the G. australis group was not apparent based on prima-facie morphological data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrative taxonomic analyses utilise multiple independent data sources to illuminate patterns of phenotypic and genetic differentiation (De Queiroz, 2007;Padial et al, 2010). Thus, in addition to the traditional morphological characters upon which taxonomy was founded hundreds of years ago, systematists in recent decades have progressively added a growing battery of genetic approaches to analyse evidence from karyotypes, allozymes, mtDNA sequence data and, increasingly common, loci from the nuclear genome (Oliver, Keogh & Moritz, 2015). However, genetic species delimitation methods can incorrectly diagnose distinct populations as 'species', especially where dispersal rates are low or sampling is sparse (Carstens et al, 2013;Sukumaran & Knowles, 2017;Leaché et al, 2018;Singhal et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%