1971
DOI: 10.1037/h0030606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approach to the prediction of medical specialization: Student-based Strong Vocational Interest Blank scales.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original SVIB was developed by identifying items that differentiated men in specific occupations from men in general (Strong, 1927)—initial forms focused on men due to the higher representation of men in the workforce. Validation studies assessed whether interest scales could predict occupational choice and distinguish between individuals currently in different occupations (e.g., Athelstan & Paul, 1971 ; Campbell, Borgen, Eastes, Johansson, & Peterson, 1968) . Early versions were valuable to users and counselors, yet the evaluation metrics were somewhat dismal by today’s standards.…”
Section: Key Research Questions and Influential Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original SVIB was developed by identifying items that differentiated men in specific occupations from men in general (Strong, 1927)—initial forms focused on men due to the higher representation of men in the workforce. Validation studies assessed whether interest scales could predict occupational choice and distinguish between individuals currently in different occupations (e.g., Athelstan & Paul, 1971 ; Campbell, Borgen, Eastes, Johansson, & Peterson, 1968) . Early versions were valuable to users and counselors, yet the evaluation metrics were somewhat dismal by today’s standards.…”
Section: Key Research Questions and Influential Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This doctor criterion group resulted in a lack of predictive validity for the SVIB (Tucker & Strong, 1962) and a successful predictive validity for the MSPI (Zimny, 1980). Athelstan & Paul (1971) conducted a second study of the SVIB, changing, the criterion group to students. Medical students' responses to the SVIB were grouped into specialties after they entered their residency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While an exact definition of these variables is not given in the articles cited, it is probably safe to assume that they do not include personality variables. Both Plovnick (1979) and Athelstan & Paul (1971) suggested that differences between medical specialties may also include personality variables. The present study explores the role of personality variables in the prediction of medical students' career choices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more appropriate methodology would be to construct the original scales from inventory blanks obtained from students whose later specialty choices could be determined. This method has recently been applied by Athelstan and Paul (1971), who derived scales for general surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics, and psychiatry from the protocols of 1583 students. Scales were attempted for general practice and internal medicine, but these analyses did not produce enough differentiating items to warrant further attention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%