2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(01)00934-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New AFM imaging for observing a high aspect structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we explain the StepIn™ mode 15,16,17,18,19 . In this method, which is illustrated in Figure 3, after each height sampling point (i.e., measurement pixel), the AFM probe is retracted to a height where the probe tip does not detect short distance forces (such as van der Waals forces and capillary forces) from the sample, and the probe is moved laterally to the next measuring point (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we explain the StepIn™ mode 15,16,17,18,19 . In this method, which is illustrated in Figure 3, after each height sampling point (i.e., measurement pixel), the AFM probe is retracted to a height where the probe tip does not detect short distance forces (such as van der Waals forces and capillary forces) from the sample, and the probe is moved laterally to the next measuring point (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we explain StepIn™ mode 13,14,15,16,17 . In this method, which is illustrated in Figure 2, after each height sampling point (i.e., measurement pixel), the AFM probe is retracted to a height where the probe tip does not detect short distance forces (such as van der Waals forces and capillary forces) from the sample, and the probe is moved laterally to the next measuring point (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these applications, special tips with high aspect ratios are required, including exotic tips such as carbon nanotubes (Bhushan et al , 2004). Alternatively, a ‘hopping’ approach to the X‐Y scanning of the AFM has been shown to help reduce tip‐sample convolution (Hosaka et al , 2002). The Phoenix AFM (Akiyama et al , 2001; Pike et al , 2001) however, being a space‐qualified instrument, is limited in its range of available tip geometries, as robustness is a key criteria for space‐bound hardware, and high‐aspect ratio tips tend to be very fragile and more difficult to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%