2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.106.252501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron Skin ofPb208, Nuclear Symmetry Energy, and the Parity Radius Experiment

Abstract: A precise determination of the neutron skin Δr(np) of a heavy nucleus sets a basic constraint on the nuclear symmetry energy (Δr(np) is the difference of the neutron and proton rms radii of the nucleus). The parity radius experiment (PREX) may achieve it by electroweak parity-violating electron scattering (PVES) on (208)Pb. We investigate PVES in nuclear mean field approach to allow the accurate extraction of Δr(np) of (208)Pb from the parity-violating asymmetry A(PV) probed in the experiment. We demonstrate a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
466
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 425 publications
(504 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
29
466
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a strong correlation is consistent with two recent studies that employ a large number of accurately-calibrated relativistic and non-relativistic interactions to uncover the correlation [47,48]. Also consistent with recent studies [6,48], is the fact that the proposed 1% measurement of the neutron radius of 208 Pb by the PREx collaboration [42,43] may not be able to place a significant constrain on L. For example, our covariance analysis suggests that the 20% uncertainty assumed for L translates into a theoretical error in the neutron skin of 0.037 fm-or about a 0.7% uncertainty in the neutron radius of 208 Pb. Conversely, if L is to be determined to within 10% (i.e., L ≈ 60 ± 6 MeV) then the neutron skin must be constrained to about 0.018 fm so the neutron radius must be measured with close to a 0.3% accuracy-a fairly daunting task.…”
Section: B Example 2: Non-linear Fsugold Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Such a strong correlation is consistent with two recent studies that employ a large number of accurately-calibrated relativistic and non-relativistic interactions to uncover the correlation [47,48]. Also consistent with recent studies [6,48], is the fact that the proposed 1% measurement of the neutron radius of 208 Pb by the PREx collaboration [42,43] may not be able to place a significant constrain on L. For example, our covariance analysis suggests that the 20% uncertainty assumed for L translates into a theoretical error in the neutron skin of 0.037 fm-or about a 0.7% uncertainty in the neutron radius of 208 Pb. Conversely, if L is to be determined to within 10% (i.e., L ≈ 60 ± 6 MeV) then the neutron skin must be constrained to about 0.018 fm so the neutron radius must be measured with close to a 0.3% accuracy-a fairly daunting task.…”
Section: B Example 2: Non-linear Fsugold Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Future electroweak measurements will help narrow these intervals even further. Given the strong correlation between the neutron skin thickness of a neutron-rich nucleus and the slope of the symmetry energy L [33,36,60], it is reasonable to expect that the α D J-∆r np correlation will extend to the α D J-L case, as it has been explicitly shown for 208 Pb; see …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent works also relate the neutron skin and the density dependence of the symmetry energy [45,46]. Other works relate the (soft) dipole response to the density dependence of the symmetry energy [56].…”
Section: Nuclear Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%