1962
DOI: 10.13182/nse62-a26055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron Capture to Fission Ratios in U 233 , U 235 , Pu 239

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7-9 also agree well with the available experimental data for the capture [38][39][40][41][42], (n, 2n) [43,44] and (n, 3n) [43,45] reactions, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…7-9 also agree well with the available experimental data for the capture [38][39][40][41][42], (n, 2n) [43,44] and (n, 3n) [43,45] reactions, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…To increase the total number of data points (especially at incident neutron energies higher than 300 keV), we add three measurements done after 1980 [14][15][16] and four older measurements including data points at neutron energies higher than 300 keV. [17][18][19][20] The information on systematic uncertainties reported in these additional seven measurements is not enough for the present analysis and we made an assumption that energy dependent uncertainties given by the authors are statistical and they have a large constant total systematic error of 3%. All the experimental data are obtained from the EXFOR database 21) in the form of value (ratio of 235 U neutron capture cross section to 235 U neutron fission cross section).…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available data for this ratio present a dispersion of more than 25% due to the high uncertainties of the capture cross section [1,2]. For these experimental data little information is available on the measurement methods, types of detectors used, the neutron source, uncertainties as well as the energy ranges [3]- [7]. Fig.…”
Section: Present Data Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent nuclear data sensitivity analysis [1,2] of the breeding of the thorium cycle, have shown that the fissile regeneration is dominated by uncertainties in the α ratio between the capture and fission cross section of 233 U. The available experimental data are at the present insufficient [3]- [7], and inconsistencies still exist among nuclear data libraries [8]. Therefore, new and accurate measurements for fission and neutron capture reactions of 233 U are required to improve the reliability of cross section data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%