2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16170-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron capture cross section measurements for 238U in the resonance region at GELINA

Abstract: Abstract. Measurements were performed at the time-of-flight facility GELINA to determine the 238 U(n, γ) cross section in the resonance region. Experiments were carried out at a 12.5 and 60 m measurement station. The total energy detection principle in combination with the pulse height weighting technique was applied using C 6D6 liquid scintillators as prompt γ-ray detectors. The energy dependence of the neutron flux was measured with ionisation chambers based on the 10 B(n, α) reaction. The data were normalis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 with a resolution of 50 bin/decade (i.e., dE/E = 2%). As can be seen, up to 20 keV they substantially agree with the recently published data by Ullmann et al [46] and Kim et al [47], and with the cross section recommended by Carlson et al [12] and by both 034604-11 TABLE IV. Average capture cross section (σ γ ) and total uncertainty from this work, for neutron energy bins between E l and E h .…”
Section: Fig 10 Measuredsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 with a resolution of 50 bin/decade (i.e., dE/E = 2%). As can be seen, up to 20 keV they substantially agree with the recently published data by Ullmann et al [46] and Kim et al [47], and with the cross section recommended by Carlson et al [12] and by both 034604-11 TABLE IV. Average capture cross section (σ γ ) and total uncertainty from this work, for neutron energy bins between E l and E h .…”
Section: Fig 10 Measuredsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…238 U(n,γ ) cross section from this work (red dots) compared to the recently published data by Ullmann et al [46] (green triangles) and Kim et al [47] (blue squares), and to the cross section recommended by Carlson et al [12] (blue circles connected by dotted blue line). The evaluated cross sections from JEFF-3.2 (dark green line) and ENDF/B-VII.1 (cyan line) are plotted for comparison.…”
Section: B Unresolved Resonance Regionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…IAEA CIELO 238 U (n,g) cross sections were adopted from Neutron Standards fit [19] and are shown in Figure 4b compared to evaluated JEFF-3.3 cross section. Evaluated reference 238 U (n,g) cross sections within the Neutron Standards are in excellent agreement with newest highaccuracy measurement at JRC Geel [32,33], while the evaluated JEFF-3.3 cross sections are lower in the whole energy range. The difference between both evaluations reaches about 7% around 45 keV.…”
Section: Capture Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Assimilation results for 238 U capture are compared with differential measurements 15 and with the "a priori" JEFF-3.1.1, CIELO and JEFF-3.3 evaluation (Figure 2). Posterior uncertainties for assimilation results are in dotted line.…”
Section: Trends For 238 U Capture and Inelasticmentioning
confidence: 99%