2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2010.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron activation analysis: A primary method of measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
198
0
59

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 385 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
198
0
59
Order By: Relevance
“…A preliminary characterisation study on two elements (As and Zn) was performed by using neutron activation analysis (k 0 -NAA) as a primary method [19]. The values obtained were in the range of 40-60 mg/kg for As and 20-30 mg/kg for Zn and thus comparable with the ones obtained during the homogeneity and stability tests (Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Temperature (°C)supporting
confidence: 62%
“…A preliminary characterisation study on two elements (As and Zn) was performed by using neutron activation analysis (k 0 -NAA) as a primary method [19]. The values obtained were in the range of 40-60 mg/kg for As and 20-30 mg/kg for Zn and thus comparable with the ones obtained during the homogeneity and stability tests (Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Temperature (°C)supporting
confidence: 62%
“…The research described in this paper deals with such an orientation on the trace element levels in dry dog food commercially available in Brazil. Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) was used allowing a wide evaluation due to its multi-element capacity (Greenberg et al 2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of this range is not too unusual: pilot studies and key comparisons organized by the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM) reveal differences among laboratory means determined mostly by national metrology laboratories range from 5% to 15%. 16 For CRM SWCNT-1, several reasons for the variation of inter-and intralaboratory results may be considered: (i) minor differences of nuclear data, namely, radionuclide half-lives, used in relative and k 0 standardization; (ii) interbottle and within-bottle heterogeneity; (iii) variation due to absorbed water content (all results are reported on "as-received basis"); (iv) uncorrected spectral (fission) interferences. The differences of half-lives used in relative standardization 21 compared to those contained, e.g., in the k 0 software package Kayzero for Windows 22 are minimal (zero or up to <± 0.05%) for most radionuclides employed in this work, except for 24 Na (−0.25%), 42 K (+0.32%), and 187 W (−1.17%).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantageous role of INAA and PGAA in the elemental characterization of a material that is difficult to bring into a solution and that is easy to contaminate during preparation of the test portion for subsequent analysis by different analytical techniques has again been demonstrated. 16 It may confidently be expected that the increased number of elements for which mass fractions in CRM SWCNT-1 are known will foster further development of rigorous physicochemical methods for characterization of such materials.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation