2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.15.20065623
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutralizing Antibodies Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 Inpatients and Convalescent Patients

Abstract: Background. COVID-19 is a pandemic with no specific antiviral treatments or vaccines. The urgent needs for exploring the neutralizing antibodies from patients with different clinical characteristics are emerging. Methods.A total of 117 blood samples were collected from 70 COVID-19 inpatients and convalescent patients. The presence of neutralizing antibody was determined with a modified cytopathogenic assay based on live SARS-CoV-2. The dynamics of neutralizing antibody levels at different with different clinic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
137
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
14
137
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our assays included controls from adults with RT-PCR-confirmed infections, as well as samples from five children with confirmed infections collected at various times post symptom onset, including children from outside the study population (see "Methods-Study participants" for additional details). Neither adult nor child samples <1 week post symptom onset were seropositive by our criteria, consistent with prior reports that infected individuals generally do not become seropositive until at least a week post symptom onset [10][11][12][13][14] . However, all samples ≥1 week post symptom onset were seropositive, and in most cases, the signal greatly exceeded pre-2020 negative controls.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our assays included controls from adults with RT-PCR-confirmed infections, as well as samples from five children with confirmed infections collected at various times post symptom onset, including children from outside the study population (see "Methods-Study participants" for additional details). Neither adult nor child samples <1 week post symptom onset were seropositive by our criteria, consistent with prior reports that infected individuals generally do not become seropositive until at least a week post symptom onset [10][11][12][13][14] . However, all samples ≥1 week post symptom onset were seropositive, and in most cases, the signal greatly exceeded pre-2020 negative controls.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2a, b). While this convenience sample from children seeking medical care is unlikely to be representative of all children in Seattle, the period seroprevalence measurements for our population are similar to all-age cumulative incidence estimates for the Seattle region based on viral testing and mortality data 20,21 , given the ≈1-2-week lag between symptom onset and seroconversion [10][11][12][13][14] . In addition, the temporal dynamics of seropositivity in our study population mirrors recent viral testing-based findings that infection in Seattle area children was rare before March 2020 22 , but increased markedly in March and April 23 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a systematic review of 38 studies that evaluated the sensitivity of antibody testing by time since symptom onset, IgM was detected in 23% by one week, in 58% by two weeks, and in 75% by three weeks; the corresponding detection rates for IgG were 30, 66, and 88% [ 54 ]. Other studies have suggested that the rate of positive IgG approaches 100% by 16–20 days [ 58 , 71 , 72 ]. Antibody levels are expected to reach the peak level at around three to four weeks from symptom onset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted July 24, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.22.20159673 doi: medRxiv preprint 5 infection is a major concern [6,15,16]. In this context, higher antibody titers, either neutralizing or not, have been reported to be present in patients developing severe forms of COVID-19 when compared to mildly symptomatic individuals who did not require hospitalization [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Here, we aimed to explore the potential relationship between the magnitude of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies binding to RBD and NtAb targeting the S protein with the severity of COVID-19 in a cohort of hospitalized patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%