Stem cell transplantation procedures using intraparenchymal injections cause tissue injury in addition to associated surgical risks. Intravenous cell administration give engraftment in parenchymal lesions although the method has low efficacy and specificity. In pathological conditions with inflammation, such as traumatic brain injury, there is a transient up-regulation of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 which might provide environmental cues for migration of stem cells from blood to parenchyma. The aim of this study was to i) analyze the effect of intra-arterial administration on cellular engraftment, ii) compare engraftment and side effects between three different stem cell systems, and iii) analyze gene expression in these three systems. We performed specific intra-arterial transplantations with human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs), human neural progenitor cells (hNPCs), and rat neural progenitor cells (rNPCs) in a rat model of traumatic brain injury. These results were compared to the intravenous route for each cell type, respectively. Analysis of engraftment and recipient characterization was performed by immunohistochemistry. We further characterized the different types of cells by microarray and RT-qPCR analysis. Specific intra-arterial transplantations produced significantly higher engraftment compared to intravenous transplantation with hMSCs and rNPCs. No engraftment was detected after intra-arterial or intravenous administration of hNPCs. Characterization of integrin expression indicated that CD49dVCAM-1 and possibly ICAM-1 interactions through CD18 and CD11a, respectively, are important for engraftment after intravascular cell administration. No side effects, such as thromboembolic complications, were detected. When translating stem cell therapies to clinical practice, the route of transplantation and the properties of the cell lines (homing, diapedesis, and migration) become important. This study supports the use of selective intra-arterial transplantation for improving engraftment after traumatic brain injury. In addition, we conclude that careful analysis of cells intended for local, intra-arterial transplantation with respect to integrin expression is important.
INTRODUCTIONclinical phase I and II studies (4,26). Cell-based therapies are in clinical trials in, for example, Parkinson's disease (13,14), ischemic stroke (4,21), and spinal cord Emerging stem cell therapies aimed at treatment of different central nervous system (CNS) disorders show lesions (29). When comparing intra-arterial and intravenous transplantations in clinical trials following spinal great promise (7). Different stem cell lines have been transplanted in a wide spectrum of pathological condicord injuries patient outcome seems to favor an intraarterial approach (29). Evidence is gathering for both tions, both in preclinical animal models and in a few open surgical and different intravascular methods of stream, as the multiple sclerosis pharmaceutical monoclonal antibody drug Natalizumab that target it (28). With transplantation to the CNS (4...