2021
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.202100000-40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychomotor Development in Children and Adolescents With Liver Diseases: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The nature of liver disease, the evolutionary course and duration of liver diseases, as well as the degree of severity and disability can trigger multiple outcomes with repercussions on neuromotor acquisition and development. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of liver disease on the neuropsychomotor development of children and adolescents with their native livers and those who underwent liver transplantation. METHODS: Observational studies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…those without chronic health conditions potentially impacting on the trajectory of development, 29 ). Evidence indicates that almost half of children with liver conditions require additional learning support at school 30 and preliminary findings indicate that cognition is poorer relative to the general population 31 . The skills needed for independent condition management may therefore develop later still in this population and may contribute to this finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…those without chronic health conditions potentially impacting on the trajectory of development, 29 ). Evidence indicates that almost half of children with liver conditions require additional learning support at school 30 and preliminary findings indicate that cognition is poorer relative to the general population 31 . The skills needed for independent condition management may therefore develop later still in this population and may contribute to this finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%