1986
DOI: 10.1136/oem.43.9.626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychological studies on lead workers in Singapore.

Abstract: The neuropsychological performance of a group of 49 workers occupationally exposed to lead was compared with a matched control group of 36 non-exposed workers. The psychometric measurements were composed of tests covering a broad range of different neuropsychological functions, particular emphasis being given to perceptual motor ability and attention concentration functioning. A questionnaire to assess subjective symptoms in mood, sleep disturbance, poor concentration and forgetfulness, somatic complaints, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the P300 latency was signi®cantly correlated with BPbs in the latter two studies. These ®ndings agree with the data from neurobehavioral studies, which indicated impairment of psychological performance and reduction in intelligence in lead workers [Baker et al, 1984;Mantere et al, 1984;Araki et al, 1986c;Jeyaratnam et al, 1986;Yokoyama et al, 1988;Stollery et al, 1991] and with the data on the event-related potential in children [Otto et al, 1981]. Thus, it appears that cognitive function is especially susceptible to lead in its low-level exposure.…”
Section: Event-related Potential (P300)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, the P300 latency was signi®cantly correlated with BPbs in the latter two studies. These ®ndings agree with the data from neurobehavioral studies, which indicated impairment of psychological performance and reduction in intelligence in lead workers [Baker et al, 1984;Mantere et al, 1984;Araki et al, 1986c;Jeyaratnam et al, 1986;Yokoyama et al, 1988;Stollery et al, 1991] and with the data on the event-related potential in children [Otto et al, 1981]. Thus, it appears that cognitive function is especially susceptible to lead in its low-level exposure.…”
Section: Event-related Potential (P300)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Subclinical effects of lead on the central and peripheral nervous systems have been widely documented through demonstration of prolongation of latencies in visual, auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials and in eventrelated potentials [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] , of impairment of psychological performance 2,4,5,[14][15][16][17][18] , and of slowing of nerve conduction velocities 1,[4][5][6][7][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] . Some groups of investigators reported that postural balance was adversely affected by lead using a computerized static posturography [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to lead was expressed in blood lead levels (Jeyaratnam et al, 1986;Mantere et al, 1984;Pasternak et al, 1989;Repko et al, 1975Repko et al, , 1978Stollery et al, 1989;Tola and Nordman, 1977), zinc protoporphyrin (Parkinson et al, 1986;Valciukas et al, 1978a,b), and deltaaminolevulinic acid (Tola and Nordman, 1977). A blood lead level between 40 and 60 g/dl was re- ported to be associated with neurobehavioral impairment (Baker et al, 1984;Campara et al, 1984;Jeyaratnam et al, 1986).…”
Section: Lead Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%