1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb43165.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychological Correlates of Minimal Brain Dysfunction *

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of discriminant validation studies have been performed showing both the LNNB-C (Gustavson et al, 1982;Wilkening, Golden, MacInnes, Plaisted, & Hermann, 1981) and the HRNB-C (Boll, 1974;Golden, 1977;Reitan & Boll, 1973) to be effective in discriminating learning disabled, brain damaged, and psychiatric populations at a high accuracy rate. Although HI children and adolescents have obvious inclusion within the brain-damaged population, several HI subjects have been included among the LD and psychiatric population as well.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Test Batteries Used With Chismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A number of discriminant validation studies have been performed showing both the LNNB-C (Gustavson et al, 1982;Wilkening, Golden, MacInnes, Plaisted, & Hermann, 1981) and the HRNB-C (Boll, 1974;Golden, 1977;Reitan & Boll, 1973) to be effective in discriminating learning disabled, brain damaged, and psychiatric populations at a high accuracy rate. Although HI children and adolescents have obvious inclusion within the brain-damaged population, several HI subjects have been included among the LD and psychiatric population as well.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Test Batteries Used With Chismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The term “specific learning disability” (SLD) was introduced by Kirk and Bateman (24). Other terms have been used relatively interchangeably in the literature: dyslexia (16), minimal brain dysfunction (32), minimal brain damage (7), Strauss Syndrome (42), neurophrenia (11), perceptually handicapped (17), hyperkinetic syndrome (5), and psychoneurologically learning disabled (27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study to develop these norms also might serve to replicate the first study in regard to the age variable, found in Study I to be a significant variable for the adolescent age range. Reitan and Boll (1973) found no sex differences in children on tapping tasks, and studies of similar motor tasks (Costantini et al, 1973;Denckla, 1973) also found no sex difference. Nonetheless, Russell et al (1970) recommended that faster norms be used for males than for females.…”
Section: Study Ii-sex and Ethnicitymentioning
confidence: 92%