2014
DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2014.939181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiology of Speech Differences in Childhood Apraxia of Speech

Abstract: Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during a picture naming task of simple and complex words in children with typical speech and with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Results reveal reduced amplitude prior to speaking complex (multisyllabic) words relative to simple (monosyllabic) words for the CAS group over the right hemisphere during a time window thought to reflect phonological encoding of word forms. Group differences were also observed prior to production of spoken tokens regardless of word c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, an event-related potentials study involving children aged 9 -15 years with deficits in motor speech control and planning, compared to control children with typical speech during a picture-naming task. The results showed reduced amplitudes over the right hemisphere prior to the production of multisyllabic relative to monosyllabic words in the children with motor speech control deficits [8]. These studies provided consistent findings indicating different cortical activities related to processing of speech production areas in children with SSD.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…More recently, an event-related potentials study involving children aged 9 -15 years with deficits in motor speech control and planning, compared to control children with typical speech during a picture-naming task. The results showed reduced amplitudes over the right hemisphere prior to the production of multisyllabic relative to monosyllabic words in the children with motor speech control deficits [8]. These studies provided consistent findings indicating different cortical activities related to processing of speech production areas in children with SSD.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Unlike NWR, however, MSW may be more directly associated with exposure to real words that contain complex phonological sequences. Previous studies have revealed that children with sCAS, as well as those with less severe forms of SSD, have persisting weaknesses in producing multisyllable words (Lewis et al, 2015;Peter, Lancaster, Vose, Middleton, & Stoel-Gammon, 2018;Peter et al, 2016;Preston & Edwards, 2007;Preston et al, 2014). Deficits in phonological encoding, phonological memory, and motor planning and programming associated with MSW can persist into adulthood for some individuals with CAS and affect reading and spelling (Peter et al, 2013(Peter et al, , 2018.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described presently, we posit that one "moment" of apraxia-a point in talking when pre-execution commands are not sufficient to continue speaking-includes an inappropriate pause due to transcoding deficits in both representational and motor speech processes. Although origins of such deficits in CAS and AAS differ in pathobiology, we take the position that the two forms of apraxia of speech share generally similar speech processes, with more recent emphasis in the developmental form of apraxia of speech also placed on the processing of feedforward information (e.g., Iuzzini-Seigel et al, 2015;Nijland, Maassen, & van der Meulen, 2003;Preston et al, 2014;Terband et al, 2009;Terband & Maassen, 2010).…”
Section: Sdcs Level IVmentioning
confidence: 99%