2008
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2008.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuronal Correlates of Facial Emotion Discrimination in Early Onset Schizophrenia

Abstract: Emotion discrimination deficits represent a well-established finding in schizophrenia. Although imaging studies addressed the cerebral dysfunctions underlying emotion perception in adult patients, the question of trait vs state characteristics is still unresolved. The investigation of juvenile patients offers the advantage of studying schizophrenia at an age where influences of illness course and long-term medication are minimized. This may enable a more detailed characterization of emotion discrimination impa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it appears that the impairments in the recognition of the emotions might be due to distinct neuro-functional impairments such as a deficit of the connectivity between several brain regions in autism (the amygdala and the associative temporal and prefrontal gryi, Monk et al, 2010), or a hypo activation of the visual regions in other pathological conditions such as schizophrenia (Seiferth et al, 2009). It seems thus that a common symptom -the impairment of the processing of emotions -might be due to different neuro-functional deficits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, it appears that the impairments in the recognition of the emotions might be due to distinct neuro-functional impairments such as a deficit of the connectivity between several brain regions in autism (the amygdala and the associative temporal and prefrontal gryi, Monk et al, 2010), or a hypo activation of the visual regions in other pathological conditions such as schizophrenia (Seiferth et al, 2009). It seems thus that a common symptom -the impairment of the processing of emotions -might be due to different neuro-functional deficits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Emotional processing deficits involving social cognition are associated with poor functional outcomes (Hooker and Park, 2002) and negative symptoms in patients with SZ. Behavioral studies suggest that patients with SZ tend to misinterpret neutral faces as negative emotional faces (Kohler et al, 2003;Cohen and Minor, 2010;Habel et al, 2010) and are impaired in processing emotional aspects of facial expressions affected for specificity (correct rejection of a non-target emotion) but not sensitivity (correct identification of a target emotion) (Schneider et al, 2006;Seiferth et al, 2009;Habel et al, 2010). Several brain regions are thought to be involved in face recognition: the inferior occipital gyrus for early perception of facial features; the superior temporal sulcus for changeable aspects of face-perception; the lateral fusiform gyrus for invariant aspects of face-perception; the amygdala, insula, and limbic system for assessment of emotion; the anterior temporal cortex for personal identity, name, and biographical information (Haxby et al, 2000); and the prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices for appraising the emotional significance of stimuli and guiding social decisions and behavior (Adolphs et al, 2000;Damasio, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 A scatterplot indicating the negative correlation between HRV (y-axis) and LPP activity in response to HSF neutral faces at Cz (x-axis). r 0 .34, p < .05 Table 3 Brain regions showing significant differences in P100, N170, and N200 source activity between high and low resting HRV participants in response to BSF, HSF, and LSF fearful and neutral faces (Seiferth et al, 2009). Similarly, participants with low resting HRV showed heightened activity in the cuneus in response to HSF as well as LSF fearful faces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%