Neuromolecular interactions guiding homeostatic mechanisms underlying healthy ageing: A view from computational microscope

Abstract

Ageing brain is associated with a slow drift in structural network properties over the lifespan accompanied by reorganization in neuromolecular interactions giving rise to changes in global functional markers. What are the guiding principles of the homeostatic mechanisms that maintain the desired performance of functional neural circuits and preserve brain health during healthy ageing? We hypothesize that an ageing brain alters two primary neurotransmitters, glutamate and γ -aminobutyric acid (GABA), responsible for excitation-inhibition regulation, concomitant with anatomical demyelination to preserve critical neural dynamics that are necessary to uphold optimal network performance. Thus, often observed reorganized functional connectivity with age by several investigations is a byproduct of this adaptive process. We demonstrate that the adaptive mechanism is driven by the tuning of glutamate and GABA concentration over a very slow time scale (lifespan) that can be estimated by tracking criticality from coordinated neural dynamics at a resting state via a biophysically driven computational framework, introduced as a computational microscope. We validate several empirical observations and model predictions across three independent aging cohorts using this computational microscope. One of the key mechanisms we discover is the reduction in local glutamate levels employed by brain regions to maintain a homeostatic balance with aging. This is further supported by the invariance of measures of global functional integration during the healthy ageing process.

Contributions of short and long-range white matter tracts in dynamic compensation with aging

“…One crucial facet of brain plasticity lies in its ability to establish new connections [Murphy and Corbett, 2009] and adjust underlying biophysical parameters, such as neurotransmitter modulation [Saha et al, 2023], in response to damage in brain topology. This process is often referred to as the brain's neurocompensatory mechanism [Lövde ´n et al, 2010,Pathak et al, 2022, Petkoski et al, 2023, Saha et al, 2023.…”

Metastability indexes global changes in the dynamic working point of the brain following brain stimulation

“…The ability to switch between coordination states is driven by the tendency of the dynamical system to traverse through multiple attractors (Haken, 1983 ; Bressler, 2002 ; Kelso and Zanone, 2002 ; Tognoli and Kelso, 2014 ), quantitatively captured by a mathematical measure, metastability (Tognoli and Kelso, 2014 ; Deco and Kringelbach, 2016 ). Reflecting the fundamental role of metastability, modeling studies have found it to be a signature of brain's dynamic core (Deco et al, 2017 ) and maximized in the resting state (Hellyer et al, 2014 ; Deco et al, 2017 ; Naskar et al, 2021 ; Saha et al, 2023 ). A plethora of studies further validate this claim by showing changes in metastability to accompany altered or disordered states of consciousness.…”