2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-38355-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurometabolic and functional connectivity basis of prosocial behavior in early adolescence

Abstract: Human prosocial behavior (PB) emerges in childhood and matures during adolescence. Previous task-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have reported involvement of the medial prefrontal cortex including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in social cognition in adolescence. However, neurometabolic and functional connectivity (FC) basis of PB in early adolescence remains unclear. Here, we measured GABA levels in the ACC and FC in a subsample (aged 10.5–13.4 years) of a large-scale populat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 25 included articles, seven reported prosocial neural correlates related to behaviors that were not imaged directly (see Table 1 , column “Prosocial Measure”). Two of these used the self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire’s (SDQ) prosocial subscale related to cortical thickness changes ( Ferschmann et al, 2019 ) and resting state functional connectivity ( Okada et al, 2019 ). The other five studies used a prosocial behavioral task after neuroimaging and related prior neural activations to subsequent prosociality ( Masten et al, 2010 ; Overgaauw et al, 2014 ; Tashjian et al, 2018 ; Tousignant et al, 2018 ; Spaans et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Among the 25 included articles, seven reported prosocial neural correlates related to behaviors that were not imaged directly (see Table 1 , column “Prosocial Measure”). Two of these used the self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire’s (SDQ) prosocial subscale related to cortical thickness changes ( Ferschmann et al, 2019 ) and resting state functional connectivity ( Okada et al, 2019 ). The other five studies used a prosocial behavioral task after neuroimaging and related prior neural activations to subsequent prosociality ( Masten et al, 2010 ; Overgaauw et al, 2014 ; Tashjian et al, 2018 ; Tousignant et al, 2018 ; Spaans et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies contrasted prosocial decision-making trials based on the actual prosocial choice such that decision-making with prosocial outcomes were compared to decision-making with non-prosocial outcomes (hereafter, “prosocial choices”) ( Telzer et al, 2011 , 2013 ; Güroğlu et al, 2014 ; Lemmers-Jansen et al, 2018 ; Schreuders et al, 2018 , 2019 ; Do and Telzer, 2019 ; Do et al, 2019 ; Spaans et al, 2020 ; van der Meulen et al, 2016 ; Brandner et al, 2021 ). Twelve studies analyzed neural activation during prosocial decision-making that correlated with the frequency of making prosocial choices, and therefore accounts for between-person differences (hereafter, “giving frequency” or “behavior frequency”) ( van den Bos et al, 2009 , 2011 ; Masten et al, 2010 ; Moor et al, 2012 ; Güroğlu et al, 2014 ; Overgaauw et al, 2014 ; Will et al, 2016 ; Schreuders et al, 2018 ; Tashjian et al, 2018 ; Tousignant et al, 2018 ; Ferschmann et al, 2019 ; Okada et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations