2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.120061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurologic and cognitive sequelae after SARS-CoV2 infection: Different impairment for ICU patients

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of case‐control and cohort studies was assessed judging three categories: the selection of the study groups, the comparability of the groups; and the ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest for case‐control or cohort studies, respectively. In summary, when using the Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ) threshold standards, 9 of the 20 studies were good, 15,23,25,27,29,32,33,36,31 1 was fair, 28 and 10 were poor 10–12,14,16,24,30,34,35,37 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The quality of case‐control and cohort studies was assessed judging three categories: the selection of the study groups, the comparability of the groups; and the ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest for case‐control or cohort studies, respectively. In summary, when using the Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ) threshold standards, 9 of the 20 studies were good, 15,23,25,27,29,32,33,36,31 1 was fair, 28 and 10 were poor 10–12,14,16,24,30,34,35,37 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research and Quality (AHRQ) threshold standards, 9 of the 20 studies were good, 15,23,25,27,29,32,33,36,31 1 was fair, 28 and 10 were poor. [10][11][12]14,16,24,30,34,35,37 4 DISCUSSION…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants’ cognitive evaluations were conducted at different times since symptoms onset; that is, most of the studies (17/25) reported data related to the first 3 months, whereas the other eight studies reported data within the first four ( Mattioli et al, 2021 ; Mattioli et al, 2022 ; Miskowiak et al, 2021 ), 6 ( Aiello et al, 2022 ; Albu et al, 2021 ; Graham et al, 2021 ) and 6 + months ( Del Brutto et al, 2021 ; Frontera et al, 2021 ) from acute infection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memory was assessed in 10 studies as immediate recall, delayed recall ( Aiello et al, 2022 ; Albu et al, 2021 ; Almeria et al, 2020 ; Bonizzato et al, 2021; Di Pietro et al, 2021 ; Hosp et al, 2021 ; Mattioli et al, 2021 ; Mattioli et al, 2022 ; H. Zhou et al, 2020 ), and working memory ( Albu et al, 2021 ; Bonizzato et al, 2021; Almeria et al, 2020 ; Di Pietro et al, 2021 ; Graham et al, 2021 ; Hosp et al, 2021 ; H. Zhou et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%