2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurocognitive performance in children aged 9–12years who present putative antecedents of schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the extent and/or magnitude of brain volume differences between ASz and TD children may have been underestimated by matching on, and adjusting for, IQ. This strategy was employed given the known association between IQ and brain structure, 23 despite evidence that ASz children are characterized by significantly lower IQ scores than their TD peers, 20 as are children who later develop schizophrenia. 59 A third limitation, not unique to this study, concerns potentially inaccurate localization of SPM spatial coordinates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the extent and/or magnitude of brain volume differences between ASz and TD children may have been underestimated by matching on, and adjusting for, IQ. This strategy was employed given the known association between IQ and brain structure, 23 despite evidence that ASz children are characterized by significantly lower IQ scores than their TD peers, 20 as are children who later develop schizophrenia. 59 A third limitation, not unique to this study, concerns potentially inaccurate localization of SPM spatial coordinates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Our strategy identifies children aged 9-12 years who present a triad of replicated ASz, 16,18 defined as (a) speech and/or motor developmental delays or abnormalities, (b) social, emotional, and/or behavioral problems, and (c) psychotic-like (or subclinical psychotic) experiences. While only longitudinal follow-up will ultimately determine the specificity and sensitivity of the triad in predicting later schizophrenia, preliminary evidence has demonstrated that ASz children present several neurobiological features that characterize adults with schizophrenia, including functional-brain abnormality following commission of behavioral errors, 19 poorer intellectual and cognitive functioning, 20 and increased involuntary dyskinetic movement abnormalities 21 relative to typically developing (TD) children. Delineating biomarkers associated with a preprodromal at-risk phase may provide a means to refine identification strategies, track changes in disease phase, and monitor the impact of early therapeutic interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurocognitive deficits have been reported in individuals with psychotic experiences, most notably in processing speed (Barnett et al, 2012;Blanchard et al, 2010;Cullen et al, 2010;Kelleher et al, 2012a), a domain that has previously been highlighted as important more generally in terms of social/role functioning (Carrion et al, 2011). Furthermore, individuals with psychotic experiences have been shown to have significantly more exposure to childhood trauma (Arseneault et al, 2011;Fisher et al, 2012;Freeman and Fowler, 2009;Galletly et al, 2011;Janssen et al, 2004;Kelleher et al, 2013c;Saha et al, 2011b;Scott et al, 2007;Wigman et al, 2012b), something that might also contribute to long term dysfunction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In initial cross-sectional analyses conducted in ASz and TD groups only, we observed impairments in general intelligence, verbal memory, working memory, and executive function among ASz children aged 9-12 years [39] which were less pervasive and smaller in magnitude than those characterising adults with schizophrenia [40], but similar to those observed among CHR individuals [41,42]. In subsequent analyses performed on a larger, partially overlapping sample, ASz children performed at a level intermediate to FHx children with high familial loading (C1 first-degree or C2 seconddegree relatives) and FHx children with low familial loading (one affected second-degree relative only) across a range of neurocognitive subtests [43].…”
Section: Cognitive Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 88%