2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10522-016-9654-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurobiological effects of repeated radiofrequency exposures in male senescent rats

Abstract: The increasing use of mobile phones by aging people raises issues about the effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on the aging central nervous system. Here, we tested if mobile phone RF-EMF exposures could exacerbate senescence-typical neurobiological deficits. Thus, aged (22-24 months) and young (4-6 months) adult male rats were subjected to head RF-EMF exposures (900 MHz, specific absorption rate (SAR) of 6 W/kg, 45 min/day for 1 month in restraint rockets). To assess senescence-typical n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a previous study detected no changes in the Iba-1 expression of microglia in mouse brains after acute or chronic exposure to RF-EMFs based on Iba-1 immunostaining [ 26 ]. Consistent with the previous studies showing negligible effects on GFAP and Iba-1 expression levels [ 26 , 41 ], the present study found no differences in the protein levels of GFAP and Iba-1. Thus, these data suggest that 8 months of RF-EMF exposure did not affect age-related increases in astrocyte and microglia marker expression in the mouse brain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, a previous study detected no changes in the Iba-1 expression of microglia in mouse brains after acute or chronic exposure to RF-EMFs based on Iba-1 immunostaining [ 26 ]. Consistent with the previous studies showing negligible effects on GFAP and Iba-1 expression levels [ 26 , 41 ], the present study found no differences in the protein levels of GFAP and Iba-1. Thus, these data suggest that 8 months of RF-EMF exposure did not affect age-related increases in astrocyte and microglia marker expression in the mouse brain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, no changes in the levels of GFAP were observed after a single exposure to 1800 MHz signals [ 24 ]. GFAP immunostaining in the cortex and hippocampus showed no changes after the heads of both adult and aged rats were exposed to RF-EMF [ 41 ]. In addition, a previous study detected no changes in the Iba-1 expression of microglia in mouse brains after acute or chronic exposure to RF-EMFs based on Iba-1 immunostaining [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the effects of RF exposure on anxiety-like behavior, the results remain controversial. Bouji reported that exposure to RF field (900 MHz, SAR 6 W/kg, 45 min/day for 1 month) decreased anxiety-related behaviors in both young and aged rats [ 11 ]. Kumlin found that exposure to RF field (900 MHz, SAR 9W/kg) for 2 h/day, 5 days per week (exposure from the age of 21 days to the age of 8 weeks) did not increase the level of anxiety in rats [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the effects of RF field on brain function, Wang found that although single exposure to 1800 MHz RF field for 30 min with specific absorption rates (SARs) in brain at 2.42, 2.86 and 3.3 W/kg did not affect spontaneous locomotor activity, it increased recognition memory in mice [ 10 ]. In addition, Bouji reported that after exposing the heads of the animals to 900 MHz RF field for 1 month (SAR 6 W/kg, 45 min/day), the spatial memory, emotional memory and locomotor activity did not change, but the anxiety-related behavior decreased in male senescent rats [ 11 ]. Arendash reported that exposure to 918 MHz RF field (SAR: 0.25 W/kg, 1 h/day for 4–7 months) could protect against and reverse cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease mice [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot exclude that the repetition of the whole protocol (NMDA i.t. administrations, restraint, heat nociceptive stimulation and/or RF-EMF exposures) may have influenced data variability through possible side effects [ 17 , 18 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%