1986
DOI: 10.1038/320576a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroanatomy: Problems in pineal physiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Pavel and Goldstain [27], melatonin is a releasing hormone for epiphyseal arginin-vasotocyn. Later on, Hastings [28] concluded that indoles in general (and, in particular, melatonin) can be regulators of synthesis and secretion of a series of epiphyseal peptides (according to the modern concepts, the latter are rather numerous) [29 ]. Analyzing the interrelations between indolealkylamines and oligopeptides found in the same neuroendocrine r epiphyseal cells, Pevet [30] suggested that indoles modify permeability of the pinealocyte membranes for the peptides they synthesized, thus favoring their access into the circulation system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Pavel and Goldstain [27], melatonin is a releasing hormone for epiphyseal arginin-vasotocyn. Later on, Hastings [28] concluded that indoles in general (and, in particular, melatonin) can be regulators of synthesis and secretion of a series of epiphyseal peptides (according to the modern concepts, the latter are rather numerous) [29 ]. Analyzing the interrelations between indolealkylamines and oligopeptides found in the same neuroendocrine r epiphyseal cells, Pevet [30] suggested that indoles modify permeability of the pinealocyte membranes for the peptides they synthesized, thus favoring their access into the circulation system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever the case may be, it is sufficient to point out here that two things will be necessary to prove this hypothesis: 1) a n eventual morphological demonstration of the terminal pinealocyte endings in the habenular nucleus and the posterior commissure as reported by Korf et al (1986), and 2) a demonstration that these are indeed processes of the pinealocytes and not of aberrant intrapineal neurons. Recent comments by Hastings (1986) on this newly proposed theory of Korf et al (1986) are thought provoking.…”
Section: Innervationmentioning
confidence: 94%