2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural substrates of fear conditioning, extinction, and spontaneous recovery in passive avoidance learning: A c-fos study in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mice were assessed for learning and memory of conditioned fear, as previously described (Huang et al, 2013), using the Near-Infrared image tracking system (MED Associates, Burlington, VT, USA). On the first day of this three-day test, mice were placed in a sound-attenuating box and allowed to explore for 2 min before three exposures to a 30-s tone of 90 dB (conditioned stimulus; CS), followed by a two-sec scrambled foot shock of 0.6 mA (unconditioned stimulus; US) separated by a random interval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice were assessed for learning and memory of conditioned fear, as previously described (Huang et al, 2013), using the Near-Infrared image tracking system (MED Associates, Burlington, VT, USA). On the first day of this three-day test, mice were placed in a sound-attenuating box and allowed to explore for 2 min before three exposures to a 30-s tone of 90 dB (conditioned stimulus; CS), followed by a two-sec scrambled foot shock of 0.6 mA (unconditioned stimulus; US) separated by a random interval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nociceptive stimuli) [7]. Although the exact neural substrates and their roles involved in expression of CR are not known, several brain areas are suggested to play a role, including the amygdala, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex [9]–[13]. Strain differences in Pavlovian fear conditioning are reported [14], [15], but only few strains have been compared directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the previously reported enhancement of contextual fear conditioning could be partially explained by reinforcement enhancement, that is, NIC-induced enhancement of the ability of the shock-paired cue to drive freezing behavior. It is also unlikely that the current results reflect NIC-induced disruption of extinction of CPA; avoidance of a LiCl- 18 or FS-paired chamber 24 does not significantly extinguish in 3 days. In the present study, NIC enhanced avoidance above baseline levels, while NIC given during fear extinction training does not enhance freezing above baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%