1992
DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830370202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network formalization of the hungarian party-state system

Abstract: A description of the decision-making structure of the Hungarian Partystate system, based on empirical studies, is offered. The structure is divided into three parts: the formal hierarchies, the interlinking threads, and the feedback connections. The working mechanism, the sources of cohesion, and the maintenance of the system are explained. The working mechanism of the structure reveals pattern-recognition-type decision making and close similarity to the adaptive resonance theory (ART) of competitive learning.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Political power is monopolized by the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party, which is opposing the idea of capitalism. Csanádi and Lörincz (1992) specify further how the influence of the Party over economic processes and the property permeates the decision-making system, creating parallel and crosscutting decision-making structures, causing uncertainty and the primacy of political interests over economic rationality. Hankiss (1989a) defines the socialist system in its relation to the European ideal-type of modernization: Thus, a socialist-system, although it is an effort of modernization itself, it is seen as an anti-modernization attempt, by Hankiss, since it is characterized by the lack of chance to fulfill modern freedoms, as freedom connected to rationality, humanism and European liberties.…”
Section: A the Socialist System In Hungarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political power is monopolized by the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party, which is opposing the idea of capitalism. Csanádi and Lörincz (1992) specify further how the influence of the Party over economic processes and the property permeates the decision-making system, creating parallel and crosscutting decision-making structures, causing uncertainty and the primacy of political interests over economic rationality. Hankiss (1989a) defines the socialist system in its relation to the European ideal-type of modernization: Thus, a socialist-system, although it is an effort of modernization itself, it is seen as an anti-modernization attempt, by Hankiss, since it is characterized by the lack of chance to fulfill modern freedoms, as freedom connected to rationality, humanism and European liberties.…”
Section: A the Socialist System In Hungarymentioning
confidence: 99%