The 26th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2014 CCDC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ccdc.2014.6852423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural network adaptive state feedback control of a magnetic levitation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured value was 0.27 A, and thus (i eq , z eq ) = (0.27 A, 2 cm). Substituting the system parameters in (13), the resulting transfer function is:…”
Section: Sensors Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measured value was 0.27 A, and thus (i eq , z eq ) = (0.27 A, 2 cm). Substituting the system parameters in (13), the resulting transfer function is:…”
Section: Sensors Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that, there are several architectures that use neural networks that can be employed [11,12]. This type of control can be applied to several types of systems; however, its performance stands out compared to other techniques in the control of nonlinear and unstable systems [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper with title "neural network adaptive state feedback control of a magnetic levitation system ", proposes combine neural network adaptive control and state feedback control based on RBFNN. In simulation show that adaptive state feedback controller based on RBF has better stability than conventional PID [7]. However, it is know that neural networks need learning that can affect the controller system to become slower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, this paper did not consider disturbance in magnetic levitation. In addition, there are also other methods such as fuzzy logic controller [4], feedback linearization [5], LQR [6], neural network [7][8] [9]. Fuzzy logic controller for magnetic levitation system shows better performance than PID controller when adding mass as disturbance [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, to improve control schemes, a stricter adherence to the complex nonlinear nature of the Maglev Systems is needed. In the last several years, neural network control systems have received significant attention due to their ability to capture complex nonlinear dynamics and model nonlinear unknown parameters [46].…”
Section: Brief Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%