2000
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Mechanisms of Orientation Selectivity in the Visual Cortex

Abstract: The origin of orientation selectivity in the responses of simple cells in cat visual cortex serves as a model problem for understanding cortical circuitry and computation. The feed-forward model posits that this selectivity arises simply from the arrangement of thalamic inputs to a simple cell. Much evidence, including a number of recent intracellular studies, supports a primary role of the thalamic inputs in determining simple cell response properties, including orientation tuning. This mechanism alone, howev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

22
433
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 596 publications
(480 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
22
433
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we have established here that opposite-polarity Glass patterns drive V1 cells (simple and complex) in a manner that can account for the psychophysical results. Furthermore, it is likely that V1 cells receive both on and off inputs in a push-pull manner (for review, see Ferster and Miller, 2000). Our data and simulations both show that neuronal orientation selectivity is reduced for opposite-polarity Glass patterns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…However, we have established here that opposite-polarity Glass patterns drive V1 cells (simple and complex) in a manner that can account for the psychophysical results. Furthermore, it is likely that V1 cells receive both on and off inputs in a push-pull manner (for review, see Ferster and Miller, 2000). Our data and simulations both show that neuronal orientation selectivity is reduced for opposite-polarity Glass patterns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…There has been considerable controversy regarding the degree to which it is the precise arrangement of the ''feedforward'' thalamocortical projections that converge to create orientation tuning in neurons in layer IV of V1. There is now substantial experimental support for some of the aspects of this model ( [24,37,50]; see [25] for a recent review). However, there are also numerous features of orientation tuning that this model cannot explain ( [14,21,44,52]; see [63,65] for a review).…”
Section: Orientation Tuning In Primary Visual Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models that rely entirely on intracortical connections to produce tuning can produce orientation selectivity without any bias in the thalamocortical input [22]. As the specifics regarding this receptive field transformation are resolved [25,63,65], other issues regarding orientation tuning have begun to emerge into the spotlight.…”
Section: Orientation Tuning In Primary Visual Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The anatomical substrates for the first two properties (retinotopy and ocular dominance) are the thalamic inputs to layer 4, whereas selectivity for orientation has no established anatomical basis in primates. Unlike cat V1, where it appears that patterned input from the lateral geniculate nucleus to layer 4 provides the basis for orientation selectivity (Hubel and Wiesel, 1962;Ferster and Miller, 2000), neurons in layer 4C of primate V1 are insensitive to stimulus orientation. Instead, sharp orientation tuning is found in layers 2/3 and 4B, one synapse removed from the thalamic input (Hubel and Wiesel, 1968;Dow, 1974;Bullier and Henry, 1980;Blasdel and Fitzpatrick, 1984;Anderson et al, 1993;Ringach et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%